arXiv Machine Learning

Learning Sexism Detection Using Multi-Agent Perspectivist Preference Optimization

arXiv:2608. 04056v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: When people label text for sexism, they often disagree, and not because some of them are wrong: they genuinely perceive sexism differently.

arXiv AI
Sep 1

Evaluating and Mitigating Anti-LGBTQ Biases in German and Multilingual Language Models

The paper introduces a German-English benchmark dataset to evaluate anti‑LGBTQ biases in language models, combining community‑sourced stereotypes from German‑speaking queer individuals with a German translation of WinoQueer. Eight language models of varying sizes and architectures were assessed, revealing that they reproduce anti‑queer stereotypes with differences across identities and models. Fine‑tuning on community and progressive media content reduced bias on average, though the effect was not consistent across all models and identities.

By Melina Morch, Daniel Braun
arXiv AI
Jul 17

Step-Level Preference Learning for Generative Agents in Social Simulations

arXiv:2607. 14485v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language model (LLM)-based generative agents simulate human behavior through long-horizon decision-making processes that comprise intermediate steps such as planning, memory retrieval, reflection, and action selection.

By Wenchang Gao, Pingyue Sheng, Lanlan Qiu, Yunfei Ma, Jian Zhao, Baicheng Chen, Kangda Wang, Yuyang Tian, Shunqiang Mao, Tianxing He
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 3

GPTBIAS: A Comprehensive Framework for Evaluating Bias in Large Language Models

The paper introduces GPTBIAS, a framework that uses powerful large language models like GPT‑4 to evaluate bias in other LLMs. It employs specially crafted prompts called Bias Attack Instructions to probe for bias and outputs a bias score along with detailed information such as bias types, affected demographics, keywords, reasons, and improvement suggestions. Extensive experiments demonstrate the framework’s effectiveness and usability.

By Jiaxu Zhao, Meng Fang, Shirui Pan, Wenpeng Yin, Mykola Pechenizkiy
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 11

Alignment Reduces Expressed but Not Encoded Gender Bias: A Unified Framework and Study

The paper introduces a unified framework that simultaneously measures intrinsic (encoded) and extrinsic (expressed) gender bias in large language models using identical neutral prompts. It finds a consistent link between latent gender information and output bias, but shows that alignment via supervised fine‑tuning reduces expressed bias while leaving internal gender associations largely intact and reactivatable by adversarial prompts. The study also demonstrates that debiasing gains on structured benchmarks may not transfer to realistic tasks such as story generation.

By Nour Bouchouchi, Thibault Laugel, Xavier Renard, Christophe Marsala, Marie-Jeanne Lesot, Marcin Detyniecki
arXiv AI
Sep 3

CroCo: Cross-Lingual Contrastive Preference Tuning on Self-Generations

CroCo introduces cross‑lingual contrastive preference tuning on self‑generations, extending prior English‑only methods to 14 high‑ and low‑resource languages. A reward model trained solely on English preferences, applied to a multilingual base, yields effective within‑language rankings and improves performance in both monolingual and multilingual settings without catastrophic forgetting. The approach requires on‑policy data; off‑policy responses and online preference optimization offer limited gains, yet on structured tasks CroCo matches or surpasses the base model in most languages, and on open‑ended generation it wins 28/30 judge evaluations across 15 languages.

By Mike Zhang, Ali Basirat, Desmond Elliott