arXiv:2606. 30454v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used as agents in simulations of social systems, yet it remains unclear when their behavior can be interpreted as a faithful proxy for human decision-making.
By Henrique Ferraz de Arruda, Carlos Gracia L\'azaro, Alberto Aleta, Yamir Moreno
arXiv:2609.38516v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) can now improve themselves by revising the instructions they follow, and LLM agents are increasingly orchestrated to wor...
By Kunal Jha, Max Kleiman-Weiner, Natasha Jaques
arXiv:2607. 11250v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Exploration is essential for reliable autonomy in multi-agent systems, yet it remains unclear whether large language model (LLM) agents can explore effectively when interacting with one another.
By Hyeong Kyu Choi, Jiatong Li, Wendi Li, Xin Eric Wang, Sharon Li
arXiv:2504. 03991v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Understanding how humans collaborate and communicate in teams is essential for improving human-agent teaming and AI-assisted decision-making.
By Siddharth Srikanth, Varun Bhatt, Boshen Zhang, Werner Hager, Charles Michael Lewis, Katia P. Sycara, Aaquib Tabrez, Stefanos Nikolaidis
The paper demonstrates that test‑time communication among agents can significantly outperform independent parallel attempts on complex tasks. In experiments on the ARC‑AGI‑3 benchmark, a team of $k$ communicating agents matched the success rate of $4k$ independent agents, with the advantage growing as the team size increased. The study also shows that communication enables solving tasks that no single agent can solve, and that these benefits transfer to research‑oriented problems such as polyomino packing and MNIST classifier compression, where communicating agents surpassed prior best scores.
By Jongho Park, Vasilis Kontonis, Shivam Garg, Akshay Krishnamurthy, Dimitris Papailiopoulos
arXiv:2511. 04500v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed as decision-making agents in high-stakes domains and as imitators of human behavior in the social and behavioral sciences.
By Andrea Cera Palatsi, Samuel Martin-Gutierrez, Ana S. Cardenal, Max Pellert
arXiv:2511. 02687v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: The trajectory of AI development suggests that we will increasingly rely on agent-based systems powered by language models, composed of independently developed agents with different information, privileges, and tools.
By Tim R. Davidson, Adam Fourney, Saleema Amershi, Robert West, Eric Horvitz, Ece Kamar
arXiv:2503. 13077v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Multi-agent reinforcement learning has shown promise in learning cooperative behaviors in team-based environments.
By Amir Baghi, Jens Sj\"olund, Joakim Bergdahl, Linus Gissl\'en, Alessandro Sestini
arXiv:2608. 01425v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Training LLM-based multi-agent systems with multi-agent reinforcement learning is rapidly gaining traction, and a parallel line of work argues that such systems should be judged by their behavior, not only their reward.
By Yi Mao, Andrew Perrault
arXiv:2601. 21754v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: While Large Language Models (LLMs) excel in language-based agentic tasks, their applicability to unseen, nonlinguistic environments (e.
By Haoyu Wang, Guozheng Ma, Shugang Cui, Yilun Kong, Haotian Luo, Li Shen, Mengya Gao, Yichao Wu, Xiaogang Wang, Dacheng Tao
arXiv:2608.23541v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Does multi-agent LLM interaction help or hurt? Some work reports gains from debate (Du et al., 2024), critique loops (Chen et al., 2025), and mixture...
By Summer Eunhyung Ann, Haokun Liu, Chenhao Tan
arXiv:2606. 27909v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Theory-of-mind evaluations of large language models typically use dyadic social-deduction games, where every observable cue points to a single hidden side, so a model with strong language priors can score well without ever simulating opponents' incentives.
By Avni Mittal