arXiv Machine Learning By Amir Baghi, Jens Sj\"olund, Joakim Bergdahl, Linus Gissl\'en, Alessandro Sestini

Improving Sample Efficiency in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Simulated Football Games via Exploration

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

arXiv:2503. 13077v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Multi-agent reinforcement learning has shown promise in learning cooperative behaviors in team-based environments.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv AI
Jun 3

Human-Like Goalkeeping in a Realistic Football Simulation: a Sample-Efficient Reinforcement Learning Approach

arXiv:2510. 23216v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: While several high profile video games have served as testbeds for Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL), this technique has rarely been employed by the game industry for crafting authentic AI behaviors.

By Alessandro Sestini, Joakim Bergdahl, Jean-Philippe Barrette-LaPierre, Florian Fuchs, Brady Chen, Fabio Zinno, Michael Jones, Linus Gissl\'en
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 4

LLM-Guided Reinforcement Learning for Adaptive NPC Behavior in Multi-Agent Combat Games

The paper explores a runtime strategy-selection framework where a large language model (LLM) guides a pre‑trained reinforcement learning (RL) policy for non‑player characters (NPCs) in a Unity combat game without altering the underlying policy. Five NPC agents sharing a PPO policy were compared in a baseline setup and an LLM‑augmented setup, where a locally hosted Mistral 7B model assigns one of four tactical tags every five seconds based on live game state. Across 600 episodes against three scripted opponents, the LLM‑augmented agents more than doubled their win rate against a Balanced opponent, improved performance against an Evasive opponent, but struggled against an Aggressive opponent due to over‑reliance on encirclement; analysis of 2,430 strategy selections revealed limited zero‑shot differentiation with the model favoring Surround in 83.8% of cases.

By Hrithika Deepu Nair, Kayvan Karim
arXiv AI
Sep 25

Benchmarking the Limits of In-Context Reinforcement Learning for Ad-Hoc Teamwork

The paper introduces ICRL4AHT, a large-scale benchmark for evaluating In-Context Reinforcement Learning (ICRL) in Ad-Hoc Teamwork (AHT) scenarios using Overcooked-V2. It provides a diverse teammate suite, a reproducible pipeline, and evaluates history-conditioned ICRL algorithms such as Algorithm Distillation and Decision-Pretrained Transformer. The results show that these methods often perform worse than random baselines and do not improve with longer horizons, underscoring the difficulty of strategic inference under partial observability in AHT.

By Yuheng Jing, Kai Li, Ziwen Zhang, Jiajun Zhang, Zeyao Ma, Jiaxi Yang, Lei Zhang, Zhe Wu, Jinmin He, Junliang Xing, Jian Cheng