arXiv AI By Hyeong Kyu Choi, Jiatong Li, Wendi Li, Xin Eric Wang, Sharon Li

Do Multi-Agent LLMs Explore Each Other?

Read the original on arXiv AI →

The paper investigates whether large language model (LLM) agents can effectively explore each other in multi‑agent settings. It finds that current LLM agents often exhibit myopic and polarized interactions, leading to suboptimal coordination and higher regret. To address this, the authors propose Multi‑Agent Contextual Exploration (MACE), a lightweight framework that encourages structured peer selection, which improves exploration behavior and downstream task performance while achieving a sublinear expected‑regret bound.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Jul 14

Multi-Agent LLMs Fail to Explore Each Other

arXiv:2607. 11250v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Exploration is essential for reliable autonomy in multi-agent systems, yet it remains unclear whether large language model (LLM) agents can explore effectively when interacting with one another.

By Hyeong Kyu Choi, Jiatong Li, Wendi Li, Xin Eric Wang, Sharon Li
arXiv AI
6d ago

Multi-Agent LLMs for Adaptive Acquisition in Bayesian Optimization

The paper investigates how Large Language Models (LLMs) handle the exploration–exploitation trade‑off in Bayesian Optimization, noting that single‑agent LLM approaches suffer from cognitive overload and unstable search dynamics. It proposes a multi‑agent framework that separates strategic policy mediation from tactical candidate generation, allowing explicit, observable, and adjustable exploration–exploitation decisions. Experiments on continuous optimization benchmarks show that this decomposition improves LLM‑mediated search effectiveness.

By Mohammadsina Almasi, Andrea Carbonati, Hadis Anahideh
arXiv AI
Oct 16

Learning to Steer LLM Agents and Multi-Agent Systems

The paper introduces a steering agent that supervises large language model (LLM)-based agents and multi‑agent systems during execution to prevent goal drift. By observing the execution context, the steering agent decides when to intervene using either a low‑cost fast path or a high‑cost slow path, and both paths are jointly trained with reinforcement learning. Experiments on information‑seeking search tasks demonstrate that the steering agent improves performance and efficiency for both single‑agent and multi‑agent systems, generalizes to out‑of‑domain tasks, and allows controllable intervention frequency without retraining.

By Leyang Shen, Yaxin Gong, Yang Zhang, Chenxiao Fan, Jiakai Wang, Dong Wang, Yang Liu, Fuli Feng, Chun Kai Ling, Tat-Seng Chua