Hugging Face Trending Papers

OCR-EDR: Rendering-Aware Diagnosis and Repair for Closed-Loop OCR Improvement

OCR-EDR is a rendering‑aware framework that diagnoses and repairs OCR errors by jointly evaluating an OCR prediction, its editable form, and the rendered image of the source document. It localizes genuine mistakes while preserving valid or rendering‑equivalent predictions, then applies executable edits and iteratively reassesses with updated renderings. On the newly constructed OCRErrBench, the DocEDR model achieves 94.78% diagnostic accuracy and repairs 86.23% of errors, boosting formula metrics by up to 30.99 percentage points and improving CDM scores on several OCR systems.

arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 4

OCR-EDR: Rendering-Aware Diagnosis and Repair for Closed-Loop OCR Improvement

OCR-EDR is a rendering‑aware framework that diagnoses and repairs OCR errors by comparing an editable OCR prediction with its rendered image. It jointly assesses consistency, localizes genuine errors, and applies executable edits, optionally requesting updated renderings for iterative reassessment. On the newly constructed OCRErrBench, the DocEDR model achieves 94.78% diagnostic accuracy and repairs 86.23% of erroneous inputs, improving formula metrics by up to 30.99 percentage points on benchmark datasets.

By Linnan Zhao, Kang Liu, Hao Yu, Jiabo Zhan, Chong Sun, Chen Li
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jun 24

How Robust is OCR-Reasoning? Evaluating OCR-Reasoning Robustness of Vision-Language Models under Visual Perturbations

Vision-language models (VLMs) have achieved strong performance on OCR-based benchmarks and increasingly focused on text-rich understanding, but their robustness under controlled visual degradation remains insufficiently understood. This gap is critical for OCR reasoning, where visual corruption can induce OCR errors and structural distortions, thereby introducing uncertainty into the reasoning task.

arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 18

HunyuanOCR-1.5: Making Lightweight OCR VLMs Faster and Better

HunyuanOCR-1.5 is a lightweight, end‑to‑end OCR‑specialized vision‑language model that unifies document parsing, text spotting, information extraction, text‑image translation, and multi‑image document understanding. It builds on the HunyuanOCR‑1.0 architecture, improving efficiency with DFlash‑based OCR decoding for faster inference (6.37× Transformer speedup, 2.14× under vLLM) and enhancing capability through an Agentic Data Flow system that autonomously constructs high‑quality training data for long‑tail OCR tasks. The model achieves top‑tier performance on OmniDocBench v1.6 and sets new milestones in ancient‑script OCR, chart/table parsing, multilingual parsing, and hallucination evaluation, while remaining lightweight for deployment.

By Gengluo Li, Xingyu Wan, Shangpin Peng, Weinong Wang, Hao Feng, Yongkun Du, Binghong Wu, Zheng Ruan, Zhiqiong Lu, Liang Wu, Pengyuan Lyu, Huawen Shen, Zibin Lin, Shijing Hu, Jieneng Yang, Hongbing Wen, Guanghua Yu, Hong Liu, Bochao Wang, Can Ma, Han Hu, Chengquan Zhang, Yu Zhou
arXiv AI
Aug 20

OmniHandwritingOCR: A Diagnostic Benchmark for Evaluating Multimodal LLMs in Handwritten OCR Scenarios

OmniHandwritingOCR is a diagnostic benchmark designed to evaluate multimodal large language models (MLLMs) and OCR systems on handwritten text and mathematical expression recognition. It comprises 77.57K labeled images across six subtasks and twelve subsets, including a difficulty‑stratified multi‑line formula corpus that tests robustness to increasing structural complexity. The benchmark reveals that current systems perform poorly on complex multi‑line formulas, exhibit variable rankings across languages and formula settings, and sometimes hallucinate corrections that are not visually supported.

By Zinuo Guo, Min Zhang, Bo Jiang
arXiv Computer Vision
Oct 19

Improving OCR Accuracy Through Multi-Classifier Verification of Visually Similar Characters

The paper introduces the Character Verification Model (CVM), a post‑processing framework that uses binary classifiers to resolve visually similar character ambiguities such as 'O'/'0', 'Z'/'2', and 'S'/'5'. CVM operates independently of dictionary checks, making it applicable to non‑lexical data like serial numbers and license plates. Experiments on three OCR engines and ten fonts show accuracy gains of 3.95–14.81 percentage points, an 87.3% correction rate for ambiguous characters, and a low 2.3% false‑correction rate.

By Nuzhat Khan, Ab Al-Hadi Ab Rahman, Mohamad Anuar Kamaruddin, Muhammad Paend Bakht, Sana Fatima, Farhad Khodadadi, Ibrahim Yousef Alshareef