FlowSGS introduces a flow-based posterior sampling method that combines Split Gibbs Sampling (SGS) with Langevin dynamics for the likelihood step and Stochastic Interpolants (SI) for the prior step. By integrating a pretrained flow model into the prior step via SI's reverse-time SDE and a novel timestep correction, FlowSGS reduces the number of network evaluations compared to plug‑and‑play diffusion samplers. Experiments demonstrate state‑of‑the‑art performance on various inverse problems, including the first flow‑based solution to a nonlinear inverse problem (Fourier phase retrieval).
By Tianao Li, Xinhui Qian, Emma Alexander
arXiv:2603. 14798v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We propose a machine-learning algorithm for Bayesian inverse problems in the function-space regime.
By Zilan Cheng, Li-Lian Wang, Zhongjian Wang
arXiv:2605. 15407v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We consider amortized Bayesian inference for nonlinear inverse problems using only samples from the joint distribution of parameters and observations, including problems with unknown functions in a Banach space.
By Ricardo Baptista, Hojjat Kaveh, Andrew M. Stuart
PosteriorBench is a new benchmark that evaluates how well generative inverse solvers recover full posterior distributions rather than just a single reconstruction. It tests four physics-based inverse problems—Darcy flow inversion, Poisson source recovery, carbon capture and storage, and light transport material inference—using high-fidelity reference posteriors generated by rejection sampling and MCMC. The benchmark employs five metrics (posterior-mean error, posterior-standard-deviation error, maximum mean discrepancy, sliced Wasserstein distance, and radially averaged power-spectrum error) to assess pointwise accuracy, uncertainty, distributional alignment, and global frequency fidelity, revealing significant distribution-matching gaps in current solvers and highlighting the importance of neural operators, guidance weights, and generation noise for posterior-variance calibration.
By Jiachen Yao, Zi-Siang Hsu, Xi Deng, Aditi Gupta, Xin Ju, Sally M Benson, Gege Wen, Anima Anandkumar
arXiv:2606. 26592v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We propose latent-space diffusion posterior sampling (L-DPS), an approximate Bayesian framework for high-dimensional inverse problems governed by partial differential equations (PDEs).
By Yuanzhe Wang, Alexandre M. Tartakovsky
arXiv:2605. 08328v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Generative models based on flow matching have emerged as a powerful paradigm for inverse problems, offering straighter trajectories and faster sampling compared to diffusion models.
By Zehua Jiang, Fenghao Zhu, Xinquan Wang, Chongwen Huang, Zhaoyang Zhang
arXiv:2606.22346v2 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Principled regression for stochastic processes is a long-standing challenge with deep connections to scientific inverse problems. We introduc...
By Yaozhong Shi, Zachary E. Ross, Yisong Yue
The paper presents a method that combines flow‑matching models with energy‑based modeling to explicitly construct scalar energy functions for physical fields. These energies are derived from a matching regression objective on a linear Gaussian interpolation, avoiding variational approximations or extra MCMC steps, and can be used for energy‑corrected data generation, out‑of‑distribution detection, and posterior sampling in inverse problems. The approach enables general MCMC samplers that reduce PDE residuals and spectral distance, and it demonstrates that combining data‑driven and physics‑based energies improves OOD detection accuracy.
By Yixuan Sun, Anirban Samaddar, Sandeep Madireddy
arXiv:2610. 09281v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: In Bayesian inverse problems, posterior sampling requires generating samples that are consistent with given observations while capturing the range of plausible solutions.
By Shiqin Zeng, Zijun Deng, Felix J. Herrmann
arXiv:2609.14596v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Training-free diffusion inverse solvers typically choose between local measurement guidance and costly clean-space posterior updates. Independent poste...
By Qi Yu, Hanlin Wu, Xiaohui Sun
arXiv:2602. 11059v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: This paper addresses the issue of inversion in cases where (1) the observation system is modeled by a linear transformation and additive error, (2) the problem is ill-posed and regularization relies on a Bayesian strategy, (3)~the prior is modeled by a diffusion process adjusted on an available large set of examples.
By Jean-Fran\c{c}ois Giovannelli
The paper introduces a continuous normalizing flow model for infinite-dimensional Bayesian inference in inverse problems governed by partial differential equations. By defining a neural ordinary differential equation in an infinite-dimensional Hilbert space, a simple reference measure is transformed into a complex prior that captures prior information. The authors establish a theoretical framework for well-posedness, present training methods for two data settings, and provide sampling algorithms, applying the approach to smooth, scattering, and heat conduction inverse problems with supporting numerical experiments.
By Yang Zhao, Junxiong Jia, Tao Zhou