Provable diffusion-based posterior sampling for linear inverse problems via DDIM
arXiv:2607. 19333v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Diffusion-based methods have achieved remarkable empirical success in solving inverse problems.
arXiv:2607. 19333v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Diffusion-based methods have achieved remarkable empirical success in solving inverse problems.
arXiv:2511. 17038v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: From a Bayesian perspective, score-based diffusion solves inverse problems through joint inference, embedding the likelihood with the prior to guide the sampling process.
The paper introduces Diffusion Waltz, an MCMC algorithm that uses SDEdit-style noising and denoising as a proposal and corrects it with Metropolis-Hastings to achieve exact posterior sampling without evaluating the prior. It also incorporates observations into the proposal via a gradient‑free ensemble Kalman update while maintaining exactness. In experiments on a non‑differentiable Navier‑Stokes initial‑condition recovery problem, Diffusion Waltz outperforms existing baselines across various noise and nonlinearity regimes.
The paper introduces a Posterior‑Dynamics Framework that leverages pretrained diffusion models as multiscale priors for linear imaging inverse problems such as deblurring, super‑resolution, and inpainting. By constructing a surrogate likelihood centered on the clean image and incorporating diffusion uncertainty, the authors derive continuous posterior dynamics and a tunable Langevin component for adaptive exploration. They prove theoretical guarantees (endpoint consistency, finite‑horizon tracking, weak accuracy) and present the PD‑IMEX sampler, which achieves high‑quality reconstructions with only 100 score evaluations and controllable fidelity‑diversity trade‑offs.
FlowSGS introduces a flow-based posterior sampling method that combines Split Gibbs Sampling (SGS) with Langevin dynamics for the likelihood step and Stochastic Interpolants (SI) for the prior step. By integrating a pretrained flow model into the prior step via SI's reverse-time SDE and a novel timestep correction, FlowSGS reduces the number of network evaluations compared to plug‑and‑play diffusion samplers. Experiments demonstrate state‑of‑the‑art performance on various inverse problems, including the first flow‑based solution to a nonlinear inverse problem (Fourier phase retrieval).
The paper introduces RED-KLwSGS, a new posterior sampling method for Bayesian imaging inverse problems that combines exact Gaussian updates for the data variable with underdamped (kinetic) Langevin diffusion for the auxiliary variable, driven by a one‑shot denoising score. It achieves the same per‑iteration cost as existing Langevin‑within‑SGS samplers while providing non‑asymptotic Wasserstein‑2 convergence guarantees for strongly log‑concave priors. A further variant, Joint-RED-KLwSGS, applies kinetic Langevin diffusion to both variables, and experiments using denoising diffusion probabilistic models on FFHQ and ImageNet demonstrate faster convergence and high‑quality image reconstruction.
The paper introduces flow matching as an amortized alternative to Markov chain Monte Carlo for sampling from posterior distributions in Bayesian inverse problems. By training a transport map on joint samples of parameters and data, the method produces independent approximate posterior samples for any observation at negligible online cost, eliminating the need for new likelihood evaluations. The authors provide accuracy estimates in total‑variation distance and Kullback‑Leibler divergence, propose a hybrid Metropolized sampler for exactness, and validate the approach on examples such as electrical impedance tomography and a likelihood‑free Lotka‑Volterra model.
FlowSGS introduces a flow-based posterior sampling method that combines Split Gibbs Sampling with annealed coupling and Stochastic Interpolants to improve flow priors for inverse imaging. The approach includes a novel timestep correction and accelerated warm-up using one-step flow models, resulting in faster and more accurate performance across various imaging tasks. It also demonstrates the first application of flow-based samplers to a nonlinear inverse problem, namely Fourier phase retrieval, and extends one-step flow models to principled Bayesian inverse imaging.
arXiv:2602. 11711v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: This article addresses the issue of estimating observation parameters (response and error parameters) in inverse problems.
Score‑based diffusion models excel at inverse problems but suffer from slow inference and task‑specific hyperparameter tuning. This paper introduces principled reparameterizations that create invariances, enabling the reuse of the same hyperparameters across different tasks. Building on the RED‑diff framework, the authors present OptDiff, a streamlined pipeline that integrates convex optimization to accelerate inference, achieving notable speedups and higher image quality in reconstruction, deblurring, and super‑resolution experiments.
arXiv:2608. 15144v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Posterior sampling with a pretrained diffusion prior is governed by a conditional score whose intermediate likelihood component is generally intractable.
arXiv:2605. 08328v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Generative models based on flow matching have emerged as a powerful paradigm for inverse problems, offering straighter trajectories and faster sampling compared to diffusion models.