The paper introduces flow matching as an amortized alternative to Markov chain Monte Carlo for sampling from posterior distributions in Bayesian inverse problems. By training a transport map on joint samples of parameters and data, the method produces independent approximate posterior samples for any observation at negligible online cost, eliminating the need for new likelihood evaluations. The authors provide accuracy estimates in total‑variation distance and Kullback‑Leibler divergence, propose a hybrid Metropolized sampler for exactness, and validate the approach on examples such as electrical impedance tomography and a likelihood‑free Lotka‑Volterra model.
By Jan Blechschmidt, Oliver G. Ernst, Moritz Poguntke, Bj\"orn Sprungk
arXiv:2610. 09281v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: In Bayesian inverse problems, posterior sampling requires generating samples that are consistent with given observations while capturing the range of plausible solutions.
By Shiqin Zeng, Zijun Deng, Felix J. Herrmann
arXiv:2606. 26592v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We propose latent-space diffusion posterior sampling (L-DPS), an approximate Bayesian framework for high-dimensional inverse problems governed by partial differential equations (PDEs).
By Yuanzhe Wang, Alexandre M. Tartakovsky
arXiv:2603. 14798v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We propose a machine-learning algorithm for Bayesian inverse problems in the function-space regime.
By Zilan Cheng, Li-Lian Wang, Zhongjian Wang
FlowSGS introduces a flow-based posterior sampling method that combines Split Gibbs Sampling (SGS) with Langevin dynamics for the likelihood step and Stochastic Interpolants (SI) for the prior step. By integrating a pretrained flow model into the prior step via SI's reverse-time SDE and a novel timestep correction, FlowSGS reduces the number of network evaluations compared to plug‑and‑play diffusion samplers. Experiments demonstrate state‑of‑the‑art performance on various inverse problems, including the first flow‑based solution to a nonlinear inverse problem (Fourier phase retrieval).
By Tianao Li, Xinhui Qian, Emma Alexander
The paper presents a method that combines flow‑matching models with energy‑based modeling to explicitly construct scalar energy functions for physical fields. These energies are derived from a matching regression objective on a linear Gaussian interpolation, avoiding variational approximations or extra MCMC steps, and can be used for energy‑corrected data generation, out‑of‑distribution detection, and posterior sampling in inverse problems. The approach enables general MCMC samplers that reduce PDE residuals and spectral distance, and it demonstrates that combining data‑driven and physics‑based energies improves OOD detection accuracy.
By Yixuan Sun, Anirban Samaddar, Sandeep Madireddy
arXiv:2605. 15407v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We consider amortized Bayesian inference for nonlinear inverse problems using only samples from the joint distribution of parameters and observations, including problems with unknown functions in a Banach space.
By Ricardo Baptista, Hojjat Kaveh, Andrew M. Stuart
arXiv:2606. 17048v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Diffusion and flow-based models learn powerful data priors by training a denoiser to reverse Gaussian corruption.
By Abbas Mammadov, Ozgur Kara, Kaan Oktay, Iskander Azangulov, Adil Kaan Akan, Hyungjin Chung, James Matthew Rehg, Yee Whye Teh
The paper introduces an active diffusion-based inverse problem solver that trains a diffusion model to map between parameter and observable spaces. By iteratively detecting and correcting model misspecification through posterior uncertainty, the method can discover and learn the correct parameter region even when initial training bounds exclude the true parameters. The authors demonstrate the solver on a toy inverse problem with infinite solutions and on parameterizing quantum correlation functions for a Quantum Chromodynamics analysis of nucleon structure.
By Jitao Xu, Nobuo Sato, Yaohang Li
arXiv:2508. 09156v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We present a framework for fine-tuning flow-matching generative models to enforce physical constraints and solve inverse problems in scientific systems.
By Jan Tauberschmidt, Sophie Fellenz, Sebastian J. Vollmer, Andrew B. Duncan
arXiv:2606. 20417v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Inverse problems for differential equations arise throughout science and engineering, where one seeks to infer unknown model parameters from noisy or incomplete observations.
By Christian Jimenez-Beltran, Aretha L. Teckentrup, Antonio Vergari, Konstantinos C. Zygalakis
arXiv:2607. 19333v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Diffusion-based methods have achieved remarkable empirical success in solving inverse problems.
By Yuchen Jiao, Na Li, Changxiao Cai, Yuxin Chen, Gen Li