arXiv:2508. 18684v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Signature-based Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS) detect malicious activity by matching network or host events against predefined rules.
By Shaswata Mitra, Subash Neupane, Martin Duclos, Sudip Mittal, Aritran Piplai, Md Rayhanur Rahman, Edward Zieglar, Shahram Rahimi
arXiv:2607. 19742v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Cyber Threat Intelligence (CTI) reports richly describe real-world attack processes, but their unstructured narratives cannot be directly used for automated attack-path reasoning.
By Wenbo Hou, Ning Hu, Xueping Wang, Jiahao Gu, Wenjian Luo
arXiv:2606. 05844v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Rule-based Intrusion Detection and Prevention Systems (IDPS) offer precise attack detection as well as mitigation, however their manually crafted, signature-driven rules limit adaptability to emerging and zero-day threats.
By Hassan Jalil Hadi, Rehana Yasmin, Ali Shoker
arXiv:2606. 24245v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language model (LLM) agents increasingly automate complex tasks by integrating language models with external tools and environments.
By Pingchuan Ma, Zhaoyu Wang, Zimo Ji, Yuguang Zhou, Zhantong Xue, Zongjie Li, Shuai Wang, Xiaoqin Zhang
CVE2AP is an LLM-based system that automatically converts natural language CVE descriptions into PDDL-encoded attack paths. It uses structured prompting and an error‑feedback loop that refines outputs based on planner‑reported syntactic and solvability errors. Empirical tests across various LLMs show high quality results, with up to 86.9% syntax correctness, 78.6% solvability, and 93.1% semantic correctness, and GPT‑5.5 providing the best quality‑cost balance.
By Lin Cui, Vincenzo Scotti, Raffaela Mirandola
arXiv:2606. 05252v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Security teams routinely simulate attacks against their own systems to check whether their monitoring would catch a real intruder.
By Alexandre Cristov\~ao Maiorano
arXiv:2509. 16749v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: LLMs are increasingly pervasive in the security environment, with limited measures of their effectiveness, which limits trust and usefulness to security practitioners.
By Anna Bertiger, Bobby Filar, Aryan Luthra, Stefano Meschiari, Aiden Mitchell, Sam Scholten, Vivek Sharath
arXiv:2608.23181v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: As large language models (LLMs) continue to advance in coding capabilities, their potential in cybersecurity has drawn increasing research attention,...
By Jian Yang, Haau-Sing Li, Shawn Guo, Zixi Zhao, Yibo Tan, Jiajun Wu, Aishan Liu, Xianglong Liu, Tianyu Zheng, Bryan Dai, Chengran Yang
The paper introduces AHLERT, a system that automatically extracts environment-aware hunt leads from Cyber Threat Intelligence reports. It combines a hybrid retriever—dense vector search plus multi-hop knowledge‑graph traversal seeded with MITRE ATT&CK—with ontology‑grounded retrieval‑augmented generation to constrain leads to a defender’s assets. Evaluations on public CTI reports show that AHLERT doubles mean F1 scores and achieves an effectiveness score of ~86.95% compared to off‑the‑shelf LLM models.
By Akash Prakash, Boubakr Nour, Makan Pourzandi, Chadi Assi, Mourad Debbabi
arXiv:2606. 27091v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: LLMs fine-tuned for security classification are usually evaluated on held-out examples from the same distribution as their training data.
By Ryan Fetterman
arXiv:2606. 12231v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The adoption of AI-powered Integrated Development Environments (AI IDEs) has introduced "Rules" as a novel software artifact, allowing developers to persistently inject project-specific constraints and architectural guidelines into the context of Large Language Models (LLMs).
By Guangzong Cai, Ruiyin Li, Peng Liang, Zengyang Li, Mojtaba Shahin
arXiv:2510. 11974v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Cyber Threat Intelligence (CTI) is foundational to modern cybersecurity, enabling organizations to proactively defend against evolving threats.
By Yutong Cheng, Yang Liu, Changze Li, Dawn Song, Peng Gao