arXiv:2510. 14113v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are transforming everyday applications, yet deployment in cybersecurity lags due to a lack of high-quality, domain-specific models and training datasets.
By Matan Levi, Daniel Ohayon, Ariel Blobstein, Ravid Sagi, Ian Molloy, Yair Allouche
arXiv:2608. 06471v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Despite recent advances, frontier large language model (LLM) agents remain limited in discovering and patching complex vulnerabilities in real-world software.
By Amine Lbath, Manan Suri, Aurelien Delaitre, Vadim Okun, Massih-Reza Amini, Ram D. Sriram, Dinesh Manocha
arXiv:2606. 31639v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models are no longer only text generators.
By Seyed Bagher Hashemi Natanzi, Bo Tang
arXiv:2606. 13079v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Nowadays, the autonomous execution of cyberattacks capable of causing substantial real-world harm is widely regarded as one of the critical red lines that frontier AI systems must not cross.
By Jiaqi Luo, Jiarun Dai, Zhile Chen, Jia Xu, Weibing Wang, Yawen Duan, Brian Tse, Geng Hong, Xudong Pan, Yuan Zhang, Min Yang
arXiv:2507. 02964v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The increasing scale of AI workloads demands High-Performance Computing (HPC) infrastructure and training methodologies that are both scalable and sustainable.
By Salahuddin Salahuddin, Ahmed Hussain, Jussi L\"opp\"onen, Toni Jutila
arXiv:2512. 18542v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: AI coding assistants produce vulnerable code in 45\% of security-relevant scenarios~\cite{veracode2025}, yet no public training dataset teaches both traditional web security and AI/ML-specific defenses in a format suitable for instruction tuning.
By Scott Thornton
KaliBench is a fine‑grained benchmark that evaluates large language models’ ability to translate natural‑language queries into executable command‑line instructions for Kali Linux. It contains 8,504 query–command pairs covering 1,642 tools across 23 capability dimensions and 5 security phases, and uses a deterministic, alias‑aware evaluation pipeline with multi‑stage verification (LLM validation, sandboxed execution, and human refinement). The benchmark also supports runtime‑free verifiable rewards, enabling training improvements that bring smaller models close to the performance of a 685B MoE model.
By Pengfei Li, Naufal Suryanto, Sicheng Zhang, Muzammal Naseer
arXiv:2609.22792v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: LLM agents are increasingly used for security tasks: vulnerability discovery, exploit reproduction, and patch generation. Improving them at the model...
By Saad Ullah, Yigitcan Kaya, Christopher Kruegel, Giovanni Vigna, Gianluca Stringhini
arXiv:2508.02312v2 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs), now a foundation in advancing natural language processing, power applications such as text generation, machine...
By Kang Chen, Xiuze Zhou, Yuanhui Yu, Yuanguo Lin, Hefeng Chen, Congyu Cai, Li Shen
arXiv:2607. 20216v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Malware analysis demands rapid interpretation of complex detonation reports spanning filesystem, network, and process behaviours.
By Adel ElZemity, Shujun Li, Budi Arief
arXiv:2607. 06963v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) and generative AI (GenAI) systems, such as ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, LLaMA, Copilot, Stable Diffusion by OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Meta, Microsoft, Stability AI, respectively, are revolutionizing cybersecurity, enabling both automated defense and sophisticated attacks.
By Kiarash Ahi, Saeed Valizadeh
arXiv:2602. 12430v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The transition from monolithic language models to modular, skill-equipped agents marks a defining shift in how large language models (LLMs) are deployed in practice.
By Renjun Xu, Yang Yan