arXiv AI

Dynamic Model Merging Made Slim

arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 22

Merge++: Universal Merge Refinement Through Data-Free Checkpoint Inversion

Merge++ is a post‑hoc refinement technique for model merging that synthesizes task‑representative images by inverting expert checkpoints and then distills expert knowledge into a merged model. It operates without any additional data beyond the checkpoints and can be applied universally across existing weight‑space merging algorithms. Experiments show consistent improvements, with average gains of +2 to +8 points and up to +25.9 on specific configurations.

By Aditya Pola, Vineeth N. Balasubramanian
arXiv AI
Oct 9

FeatCal: Feature Calibration for Post-Merging Models

FeatCal is a post‑merging calibration method that reduces feature drift between a merged model and its task experts by adjusting weights layer by layer in forward order using a small calibration set. It employs a closed‑form update that avoids gradient descent or iterative optimization. On CLIP and GLUE benchmarks, FeatCal outperforms existing calibration baselines, achieving higher accuracy with fewer calibration examples and lower computational cost.

By Yanggan Gu, Shuo Cai, Zihao Wang, Wenjun Wang, Yuanyi Wang, Pengkai Wang, Sirui Huang, Su Lu, Jianmin Wu, Hongxia Yang
arXiv AI
1d ago

Model Merging Does Not Require Uniform LoRA Ranks

The paper investigates whether model merging requires all experts to use the same LoRA rank. Experiments with 36 experts across three domains and multiple ranks show that allowing each expert its own optimal rank improves multi‑domain accuracy by up to 1.8 percentage points, while traditional uniform‑rank methods can even degrade performance. The authors attribute this to how merge methods select spectral components, arguing that rank can be chosen per expert when the merge operator does not rely on magnitude alone.

By Zirong Xie, Zainab Afolabi, Nikita Kozodoi, Jack Butler