arXiv AI

CABS+: Efficient and Scalable Model Merging via Conflict-Aware Sparsification and Adaptive Weight Allocation

arXiv:2608. 12842v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Model merging has recently attracted significant attention as a promising paradigm for constructing unified multi-task models without requiring additional retraining.

arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 22

CAMFT: Conflict-Aware Mergeable Fine-Tuning for Large Language Models

CAMFT is a Conflict‑Aware Mergeable Fine‑Tuning method designed to make task adaptation efficient and merge‑aware for large language models. Unlike existing approaches that only resolve parameter conflicts after fine‑tuning, CAMFT shapes mergeability during training by guiding each task to update sparse coordinates with lower cross‑task conflict. Experiments show that CAMFT outperforms standard fine‑tuning baselines in multi‑task merging scenarios.

By Jingang Zhou, Haiyang Guo, Yuan Ma, Han Zhu, Xu-Yao Zhang
arXiv Machine Learning
1d ago

Mixture-Trained Merging for Unified Multi-Objective Models

Mixture-Trained Merging (MTM) is a method for creating unified language models that combine multiple objectives—such as mathematics, code, instruction following, and controllable thinking—into a single parameter set. Instead of sequentially post‑training on each objective, MTM trains each branch on a mixture of objectives, ensuring that the branches remain compatible in weight space and can be merged without degrading performance. The approach iteratively refines merge coefficients using low‑cost evaluations and multi‑objective Bayesian optimization, outperforming naive merging and preserving distinct behaviors across domains.

By SeongHyeon Kim, Chaeyun Jang, Seungyoo Lee, Jiyeon Ham, Yunju Bak, Boseop Kim, Juho Lee
arXiv Machine Learning
1d ago

Model Merging via Data-Free Covariance Estimation

The paper introduces a data‑free method for model merging that estimates per‑layer covariance matrices directly from difference matrices, eliminating the need for auxiliary data. This approach reduces computational costs while maintaining a principled interference‑minimization framework. Experiments on vision and language benchmarks with models from 86 M to 7 B parameters show that the method outperforms existing data‑free merging techniques.

By Marawan Gamal Abdel Hameed, Derek Tam, Pascal Jr Tikeng Notsawo, Colin Raffel, Guillaume Rabusseau
arXiv AI
Sep 3

CoMerge: Conflict-Driven Preference Optimization for Multi-Task Model Merging

CoMerge is a conflict‑driven preference optimization framework for merging multiple expert language models into a single multi‑task model without full retraining. It treats model merging as a preference optimization problem, using self‑supervised, conflict‑driven hard negative samples derived from naive merging defects to refine lightweight, tensor‑wise merging coefficients. Experiments show CoMerge achieves near‑perfect performance on MergeBench and improves instruction‑following and safety on Llama‑3.1‑8B‑Instruct while optimizing only 1,445 scalar coefficients.

By Mingjie Zheng, Zihao Chen, Wenqing Chen, Weile Yuan, Zhixuan Chu, Jianxing Yu, Zibin Zheng
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Sep 2

CoMerge: Conflict-Driven Preference Optimization for Multi-Task Model Merging

CoMerge introduces a conflict‑driven preference optimization framework for merging multi‑task large language models, reframing merging as a preference problem that uses self‑supervised hard negative samples derived from naive merging defects. By optimizing lightweight, tensor‑wise merging coefficients, the method mitigates parameter‑space conflicts while preserving task‑specific capabilities. Experiments show CoMerge achieves an average normalized performance of 0.9968 on MergeBench and improves conflict‑sensitive tasks on Llama‑3.1‑8B‑Instruct, outperforming both data‑free and data‑driven baselines while optimizing only 1,445 scalar coefficients.

arXiv Computation and Language
4d ago

Orthogonal Yet Coupled: Decoupling Geometric Components for Model Merging

The paper introduces DiGA, a Disentangled Geometry-Aware framework for merging pretrained models. DiGA orthogonally decomposes each task vector into components tied to distinct geometric attributes, aggregates these components independently, and then recombines them, thereby preserving each component’s geometric identity. Experiments across various models, tasks, and merging methods show that DiGA improves merged-model performance and reduces capability degradation.

By Zijing Wang, Yongkang Liu, Mingyang Wang, Ercong Nie, Mengjie Zhao, Yunpu Ma, Kang Liu, Zihan Wang, Shi Feng, Daling Wang, Hinrich Sch\"utze
arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 31

Pruning Laws for Large Language Models

arXiv:2504.04342v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Scaling up model parameters and training data consistently improves the performance of large language models (LLMs), but at the cost of rapidly gro...

By Ayan Sengupta, Siddhant Chaudhary, Tanmoy Chakraborty