arXiv:2607.20561v2 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: LoRA merging methods increasingly operate on the low-rank structure of task updates, yet how the common subspace is estimated and how coeffic...
By Keumseo Ryum, Joonhyuk Kang
arXiv:2609.24517v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Model merging aims to combine multiple fine-tuned models derived from a common pretrained model into a single multi-task model without additional joi...
By Hyunjoong Cho, Jinhyeok Jang
arXiv:2606. 19549v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Low-rank adaptation (LoRA) makes it cheap to train many domain- and task-specific language model adapters, but whether two adapters can be merged is usually discovered only after both have been fully trained and evaluated.
By Lin Tang, Wei Zhang, Jing Li, Hongyu Chen, Ming Zhao, Yuxuan Wang
The paper introduces Net Utility, a data‑free metric for selecting which singular directions of low‑rank adapters (LoRAs) to keep when merging across tasks. By scoring each direction for task utility and interference, and then globally selecting the highest‑scoring directions under a total budget constraint, the method avoids the uniform‑budget assumption that hampers existing merging techniques. Experiments on vision and language tasks show that Net Utility‑based rank allocation yields about a 2% performance gain over other merging methods.
By Avinash Amballa, Yashas Malur Saidutta, Wenbo Li, Lazar Valkov, Srinivas Chappidi
arXiv:2606. 19164v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Model merging aims to enable multi-task learning by integrating the capabilities of multiple models fine-tuned from the same pre-trained checkpoint into a single model.
By Longhua Li, Lei Qi, Xin Geng, Qi Tian
arXiv:2606. 03723v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Low-rank adaptation (LoRA) enables parameter-efficient specialization of foundation models, but the proliferation of task-specific adapters fragments capabilities across many adapters, complicating reuse and deployment.
By Zhengbao He, Ruiqi Ding, Zhehao Huang, Ruikai Yang, Tao Li, Xiaolin Huang
arXiv:2606. 18627v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Model merging has emerged as a training-free alternative to multi-task learning, aiming to combine multiple task-specific fine-tuned models into a single multi-task model.
By Ningyuan Shi, Zhipeng Zhou, Hao Wang, Chunyan Miao, Peilin Zhao
CAMFT is a Conflict‑Aware Mergeable Fine‑Tuning method designed to make task adaptation efficient and merge‑aware for large language models. Unlike existing approaches that only resolve parameter conflicts after fine‑tuning, CAMFT shapes mergeability during training by guiding each task to update sparse coordinates with lower cross‑task conflict. Experiments show that CAMFT outperforms standard fine‑tuning baselines in multi‑task merging scenarios.
By Jingang Zhou, Haiyang Guo, Yuan Ma, Han Zhu, Xu-Yao Zhang
Merge++ is a post‑hoc refinement technique for model merging that synthesizes task‑representative images by inverting expert checkpoints and then distills expert knowledge into a merged model. It operates without any additional data beyond the checkpoints and can be applied universally across existing weight‑space merging algorithms. Experiments show consistent improvements, with average gains of +2 to +8 points and up to +25.9 on specific configurations.
By Aditya Pola, Vineeth N. Balasubramanian
arXiv:2606. 16501v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Model merging has become a practical post-training strategy for building a single multi-task large language model (LLM) by combining multiple task-specialized models.
By Kyungjin Im, Miru Kim, Chanin Eom, Minhae Kwon
arXiv:2606. 00511v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Model merging aims to consolidate multiple task-specific models fine-tuned on different datasets into a unified architecture that performs cross-domain proficiency.
By Jungin Park, Jiyoung Lee, Kwanghoon Sohn
Multi-task model merging aims to consolidate several task-specific experts into a unified model, yet static merging consistently suffers from parameter interference. While dynamic merging models aim to bridge this gap, many works rely on the costly storage and loading of redundant expert components at inference.