arXiv:2602. 00424v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Continuous-time generative models for crystalline materials enable inverse materials design by learning to predict stable crystal structures, but incorporating explicit target properties into the generative process remains challenging.
By Philipp Hoellmer, Stefano Martiniani
arXiv:2606. 02507v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Inverse materials design is shifting materials discovery from forward prediction to targeted proposal of candidates that satisfy objectives under physical constraints.
By Anand Babu, Rog\'erio Almeida Gouv\^ea, Gian-Marco Rignanese
arXiv:2410. 08562v5 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Advanced crystal design can accelerate materials discovery across applications from photovoltaics to spintronics.
By Akihiro Fujii, Yoshitaka Ushiku, Koji Shimizu, Anh Khoa Augustin Lu, Satoshi Watanabe
The article demonstrates that a single design decision—whether a machine‑learning model’s features include parity labels—determines if the model can ever predict physically impossible values for material properties. Using group‑theoretical analysis, the authors introduce the parity gap criterion to identify which properties and crystal symmetries are affected. Experiments on 2,000 centrosymmetric crystals show that parity‑labelled models achieve exact zero predictions for forbidden piezoelectric responses, whereas models lacking parity labels produce large errors, yet both maintain comparable overall accuracy.
By Can Polat, Mustafa Kurban, Erchin Serpedin, Hasan Kurban
arXiv:2509. 15908v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Nanoporous materials hold promise for diverse sustainable applications, yet their vast chemical space poses challenges for efficient design.
By Zhenhao Zhou, Salman Bin Kashif, Jin-Hu Dou, Chris Wolverton, Kaihang Shi, Tao Deng, Zhenpeng Yao
arXiv:2608.18714v2 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Crystal symmetry dictates whether a physical response tensor must vanish, establishing a direct test for machine learning predictions indepen...
By Can Polat, Mustafa Kurban, Erchin Serpedin, Hasan Kurban
arXiv:2502. 02748v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Predicting properties of crystals from their structures is a fundamental yet challenging task in materials science.
By Jianan Nie, Peiyao Xiao, Kaiyi Ji, Peng Gao
arXiv:2606. 07712v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Progress in AI-driven crystal materials science has so far been carried by narrow architectures purpose-built for individual tasks -- graph neural networks for property prediction, diffusion and flow-matching models for crystal generation -- each excelling within its niche yet unable to act as a shared backbone across the full spectrum of materials problems.
By Zhan'ao Yao, Boxuan Zhang, Jingyuan Shu, Xiaoyu Wu, Rongyan Wang, Linjing Li, Dajun Zeng, Yudong Yao, Tingwei Chen, Youwei Wang, Xiaolin Zhao, Jiahui Shi, Jianjun Liu
arXiv:2608. 15900v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Data-driven materials discovery interpolates more reliably than it extrapolates and seldom reaches new structure types.
By Dinh-Khiet Le, Minh-Quyet Ha, Hong-Phuc Vu-Dinh, Takashi Miyake, Hiori Kino, Hieu-Chi Dam
arXiv:2607. 14475v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Disordered metamaterials feature microstructures with inherent randomness and irregularity, enabling them to achieve broader property coverage and superior performance unavailable in their regular counterparts.
By Yujie Xiang, Liwei Wang
arXiv:2608. 06448v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Recovering a periodic 3D crystal structure from sparse, unindexed electron diffraction (ED) observations is a challenging generative inverse problem.
By Germain Poloudenny, Ya\"el Fr\'egier, Arnaud Demorti\`ere
arXiv:2608. 06582v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Flow-based generative models can efficiently produce candidate structures for crystal structure prediction (CSP), but their pretrained objectives do not directly optimize downstream target recovery.
By Kaixiang Su, Hongfei Xue, Qiang Zhu