arXiv:2608.18714v2 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Crystal symmetry dictates whether a physical response tensor must vanish, establishing a direct test for machine learning predictions indepen...
By Can Polat, Mustafa Kurban, Erchin Serpedin, Hasan Kurban
The paper introduces SPARC, a reinforcement learning framework that generates crystalline materials while respecting symmetry constraints essential for meaningful physical properties. SPARC is applied to two tasks: optimizing uniaxial dielectric anisotropy, which requires specific crystal classes, and maximizing spectroscopic limited maximum efficiency, a scalar objective that lets the algorithm discover suitable crystallographic motifs. The results demonstrate that symmetry is a foundational requirement for producing robust, realizable functional materials.
By Ting-Wei Hsu, Arun Bansil, Qimin Yan
arXiv:2606. 29717v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Predicting a material's properties from its structure is a central, fast-advancing problem in computational materials science.
By Chenmu Zhang, Boris I. Yakobson
arXiv:2602. 10392v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: When designing new materials, it is often necessary to tailor the material design to have some desired properties.
By Shaan Pakala, Aldair E. Gongora, Brian Giera, Evangelos E. Papalexakis
The paper reports that autonomous agents can generate, test, and refute millions of candidate structure-plausibility laws, ultimately producing eight Plausibility Rules for Inorganic Structures (PRIS) that capture five key mechanisms of crystal stability. PRIS achieves high agreement with experimental structures (82–99%) and outperforms traditional Pauling rules, detecting damaged crystals with 87.9% accuracy and correlating strongly with synthesizability. By integrating PRIS with a synthesis score (PSS), the authors demonstrate significant reductions in expensive DFT validation and improved inverse-design efficiency, while also providing chemical explanations for failures and anomalies in crystal data.
By Zhilong Song, Lixue Cheng
arXiv:2605. 20440v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Symmetry is central to the physical sciences, yet machine learning usually captures it only approximately, leaving a residual per-step equivariance error $\varepsilon$ that compounds with depth $M$ as $M\varepsilon$, whereas exact equivariance holds at unbounded depth; we demonstrate this divergence at fourteen orders of magnitude.
By Paulina Hoyos, Shashanka Ubaru, Dongsung Huh, Vasileios Kalantzis, Kenneth L. Clarkson, Misha Kilmer, Haim Avron, Lior Horesh