arXiv:2606. 00010v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: For patients experiencing cancer, nurse navigation can ease the burden of complex care by enhancing coordination of health services and patient outcomes.
arXiv:2608. 15424v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The rapid adoption of large language models has enabled the development of clinical multi-agent systems (MAS) capable of integrating multimodal patient data and supporting increasingly complex clinical decision-making.
Researching the path to AI-augmented care and development of an AI co-clinician.
arXiv:2408. 02677v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: This study proposes a novel, integrative framework for patient-centered data science in the digital health era.
arXiv:2512. 03296v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Cancer treatment outcomes are influenced not only by clinical and demographic factors but also by the collaboration of healthcare teams.
arXiv:2606. 26494v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Medical AI remains organized around isolated models, whereas clinical care requires accountable capabilities that persist across time.
arXiv:2607. 02245v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Mental health disorders affect nearly one billion people globally, yet 75% of individuals in low- and middle-income countries receive no treatment due to workforce shortages, cost barriers, and stigma.
The paper surveys 61 studies on mental‑health AI and identifies a misalignment in how trust is evaluated across disciplines. It proposes a three‑layer framework—human‑oriented, interaction‑oriented, and AI‑oriented trust—and maps stakeholder perspectives onto these layers. The authors argue that future research should focus on calibrating human trust to actual interaction and AI trustworthiness rather than merely maximizing perceived trust.
arXiv:2606. 00044v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The integration of artificial intelligence into clinical medicine creates a fundamental tension between algorithmic probabilistic reasoning and the experiential intuition of expert physicians; applying Lawrence Lessig's \enquote{Code is Law} framework, I argue that the architecture of clinical AI systems already functions as de facto medical regulation, reshaping liability and the standard of care.
arXiv:2607. 15314v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Healthcare spans high-stakes communication, expert reasoning, and workflow execution, yet specialized LLMs that cover these use cases together remain limited.
arXiv:2311. 18424v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Developing artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms for healthcare is a collaborative effort, bringing data scientists, clinicians, patients and other stakeholders together.
The paper investigates how human interventions at specific fault points—moments when an AI agent’s reasoning is most vulnerable—affect the diagnostic accuracy of multi‑agent medical systems. Using the MedQA dataset, the authors found that correct interventions can boost baseline accuracy by up to 40%, whereas incorrect or bias‑related interventions can reduce performance by up to 6% and increase diagnostic drift and uncertainty. The study also highlights behavioral parallels between cognitive biases observed in simulated agent conversations and real‑world clinical practice, such as premature closure and susceptibility to misleading cues.
arXiv:2607. 25485v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Health AI is evolving from answering questions to agentic systems that converse with patients, reason about health records, and act on their behalf.
