AgentSWE is a new benchmark for agent software engineering that evaluates coding agents across three lifecycle stages: creating an agent from a natural‑language requirement, editing existing agent codebases, and optimizing toward a measurable target. The benchmark consists of 25 commission‑style tasks, where builders iterate on a few illustrative cases and are then tested on held‑out cases that cover the full requirement, with hard pass/fail gates or objective‑based grading. Experiments show that current coding agents fail to meet the requirements, revealing common failure modes such as overfitting, incomplete runtimes, and unsupported completion claims.
By Jiahao Wang, Hongjin Qian, Yuyang Hu, Jiajun Zhang, Zheng Liu
FrontierCS 2 is a new benchmark comprising 48 open‑ended computer‑science research tasks that place language‑model agents inside a research environment, allowing them to submit incremental patches to a working repository. Each patch is scored by a judge on a development suite, while the final evaluation uses a held‑out suite and a private reference derived from the original authors’ code. The benchmark covers 13 domains, includes a private set of over 100 future tasks, and evaluates 12 agents, with Claude Opus 5.5 achieving the highest pass rate of 58%.
By Qiuyang Mang, Wenhao Chai, Runyuan He, Dongruixuan Li, Zihan Zheng, Yujun He, Xuanyi Zhou, Hao Wang, Siddhant Ray, Bo Peng, Ruyi Ji, Shuo Yang, Haocheng Xi, Boru Chen, Xinyang David Han, Melissa Pan, Mayank Mishra, Boxi Yu, Sijia Liu, Kerem Akillioglu, Yi Pan, Zirui Wang, Mert Cemri, Diogo Antunes, Yichuan Wang, Aiwei Ivy Zhang, Zhenyang Chen, Qizheng Zhang, Kaiyuan Liu, Wenyuan Huang, Sherry Ruan, Shu Liu, Dacheng Li, Zerui Cheng, Zeyu Shen, Shang Zhou, Hanfei Chen, Yuzhong Zhang, Bohan Lyu, Qu Ao, Han Zheng, Chonghe Jiang, Jingzhuo Hu, Xiaokun Chen, Kunjun Li, Zhiqing Zhong, Haoye Tian, Tong Zhao, Yunzhong He, Hanchen Li, Ofir Press, Jiantao Jiao, Kunle Olukotun, Karthik R. Narasimhan, Jingbo Shang, Koushik Sen, Matei Zaharia, Alex Dimakis, Ion Stoica, Joseph E. Gonzalez, Alvin Cheung
arXiv:2607. 13034v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language model (LLM) agents increasingly automate multi-step engineering and informatics workflows, yet they rarely ask how much effort a task actually requires.
By Junjie Yin, Xinyu Feng
arXiv:2610.33845v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Can LLM agents carry a hard real-world problem from raw data to a system that holds its own against people? We study this in Hearthstone Battlegrounds,...
By Changlian Ma, Limin Wang
arXiv:2611.08417v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Coding agents are among the most economically consequential deployments of LLMs to date, making reliable evaluation increasingly important. Yet even be...
By E. Kelly Buchanan, Crystal Zhou, Scott W. Linderman, Christopher R\'e
The paper introduces Traverse, a benchmark of 2,518 agent trajectories and 6,967 annotated mistakes across software engineering, computer use, and science tasks, revealing that failures often go unrecovered and can cause irreversible harm before a run is deemed successful. It shows that human judges struggle to detect the first mistake in most runs, while a 4‑billion‑parameter verifier called Scout can locate failures more effectively and improve task success when used to select among candidate runs. The study demonstrates that making failure detection inexpensive and reliable can enable long‑horizon agents to learn from their own mistakes and increase trustworthiness in autonomous AI.
By Salman Rahman, Yubin Kim, Mihir Parmar, A. Ali Heydari, Genglin Liu, Simon A. Lee, Weizhi Zhang, Arian Hosseini, Ahmed A. Metwally, Yuzhe Yang, Baharan Mirzasoleiman, Xin Liu, Pavel Izmailov, Saadia Gabriel, Mark Malhotra, Shwetak Patel, Daniel McDuff, Hamid Palangi
SWE‑Duel proposes a self‑scaling benchmark for coding agents, where tasks and oracles are generated at evaluation time to prevent data leakage and adapt difficulty to participant performance. In the arena, two agents take turns as Red and Blue: Red proposes a feature, injects a subtle bug, and must repair it blind, while Blue reviews the pull request without knowing the bug and must pass all tests. A tournament of 11 model‑harness participants on 15 repositories across five languages showed GPT‑5.5/Codex CLI as the top solver and Claude Opus 4.8/mini‑swe‑agent as the top task author, with newer model versions producing harder tasks for older ones.
By Wei Minn, Zhensu Sun, Lwin Khin Shar, David Lo
The paper argues that evaluating agents as fixed models is insufficient, proposing instead to treat them as configurable systems. Using a new benchmark of four scientific tasks, the authors analyze how five configuration aspects—task information, reasoning, self‑verification, time budget, and backbone model—affect performance, noting that about 54% of outcome variance arises from run‑to‑run differences even with the same settings. The study finds that providing more task information has the strongest impact, while interactions among settings (e.g., extra time only helps with adequate information or model capability) and the choice of verification tools significantly shape agent behavior.
By Luis Wiedmann, Leander Girrbach, Cordelia Schmid, Zeynep Akata
arXiv:2606. 05548v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The rapid proliferation of Agent Development Kits (ADKs), SDK-level frameworks for building LLM-powered autonomous agents, has outpaced any empirical understanding of how framework choice affects agent performance.
By Jintao Huang, Xiaomin Li, Gaurav Mittal, Yu Hu
arXiv:2605. 28556v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: As agent capabilities advance, existing benchmarks, such as $\tau^2$-Bench, are becoming increasingly saturated.
By Tomer Keren, Nitay Calderon, Asaf Yehudai, Yotam Perlitz, Michal Shmueli-Scheuer, Roi Reichart
Coding agents are among the most economically consequential deployments of LLMs to date, making reliable evaluation increasingly important. Yet even benchmarks that are carefully validated at release...
arXiv:2609.01271v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Agentic software engineering benchmarks are typically summarized by nominal category labels such as "bug fix" or "feature implementation," yet benchm...
By Radin Shayanfar, Keheliya Gallaba, Ahmed E. Hassan