FrontierCS 2 is a new benchmark comprising 48 open‑ended computer‑science research tasks that place language‑model agents inside a research environment, allowing them to submit incremental patches to a working repository. Each patch is scored by a judge on a development suite, while the final evaluation uses a held‑out suite and a private reference derived from the original authors’ code. The benchmark covers 13 domains, includes a private set of over 100 future tasks, and evaluates 12 agents, with Claude Opus 5.5 achieving the highest pass rate of 58%.
arXiv:2607. 07946v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: DeepSWE is a benchmark of 113 original, long-horizon software engineering tasks for evaluating coding agents.
arXiv:2610.32441v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language model (LLM) agents are increasingly capable of supporting scientific workflows, but their capabilities across diverse research activitie...
The paper introduces $ au^ au$-Bench, a benchmark that turns the construction of AI agents into a measurable task. In this environment a developer agent receives real business records, client requirements, a production API, an existing codebase, and constraints on cost and models, and must deliver a complete customer‑service agent. The benchmark evaluates performance by deploying the agent against simulated users, revealing that current state‑of‑the‑art models achieve only 23.9% success while an expert‑written reference scores 82.2%.
arXiv:2610.02563v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We present OpenGameEval, a benchmark and evaluation framework for agentic game development inside Roblox Studio. It runs language models as agents in...
arXiv:2607. 01211v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Repository-level performance-optimization benchmarks such as GSO, SWE-Perf and SWE-fficiency evaluate coding agents by applying patches to real repositories and comparing runtime against unoptimized baselines and official reference patches.
arXiv:2606. 07682v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: AI agents are increasingly expected to complete long-horizon workflows that require sustained progress over hours, millions of tokens, and complex environments.
InfraDev is a new benchmark comprising 36 tasks derived from real-world pull requests to Megatron‑LM, vLLM, and verl, designed to test coding agents on infrastructure development for training, inference, and reinforcement learning across many GPUs. Each task requires agents to reimplement multi‑file changes and run correctly, with grading that includes hidden probes and a prompt exposing only the interfaces used. The benchmark reveals that current frontier models resolve only about 39% of tasks, with probes rejecting a third of submissions that pass official tests, and that structural and state errors dominate failures.
arXiv:2610.14146v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Long-horizon terminal benchmarks measure whether an agent can sustain progress through extended workflows with process rewards, not only whether its fi...
arXiv:2611.07962v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Can large language models (LLMs) advance theoretical computer science and resolve its long-standing open conjectures? To study progress toward this goa...
arXiv:2607. 08964v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: AI agents have become capable of autonomously completing short, well-specified tasks.
arXiv:2605. 17554v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Frontier deep research agents (DRAs) plan a research task, synthesize across documents, and return a structured deliverable on demand.
SWE-Skills-Bench is a benchmark that evaluates the impact of individual agent skills on real-world software engineering tasks. It uses 98 public skills paired with specific GitHub repositories, generating 3,920 paired evaluations across four agent-model configurations. The study finds that most skills are ineffective, with only a few providing modest gains while some are harmful, raising the overall pass ratio from 76.6% to 76.9%.