Contrastive Branch Policy Optimization (CBPO) is a reinforcement learning method that separates the allocation of a fixed rollout budget from the translation of branch outcomes into token-level credit. It uses generation entropy to screen branch positions, path- and node-level decay to distribute the budget, and Contrastive Branch Value (CBV) to estimate local decision sensitivity without changing reward signs. CBPO partitions trajectories into non-overlapping credit segments, preventing duplicated gradients and enabling fine-grained credit assignment using only outcome rewards.
arXiv:2606. 12384v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Recent advances in agentic Reinforcement Learning (RL) have substantially improved the multi-turn tool-use capabilities of large language model agents.
arXiv:2609.36178v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) has become a promising approach for training large language model agents. However, its uniform assignment o...
arXiv:2606. 11119v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) is a promising approach for enhancing reasoning and agentic behavior in large language models.
arXiv:2606. 25451v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Estimating token-level advantages in reinforcement learning (RL) for language models remains challenging because scaling up episodic experience collection is expensive.
Long-horizon large language model (LLM) agents are typically optimized with sparse terminal outcomes, making fine-grained credit assignment across multi-step interactions difficult. Existing approache...
arXiv:2510. 05592v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Outcome-driven reinforcement learning has advanced reasoning in large language models (LLMs), but prevailing tool-augmented approaches train a single, monolithic policy that interleaves thoughts and tool calls under full context; this scales poorly with long horizons and diverse tools and generalizes weakly to new scenarios.
EPIG-Tree proposes a compute‑optimal branching strategy for gradient‑efficient reinforcement learning, arguing that branches should be placed where they most reduce policy‑gradient uncertainty per unit of compute. By deriving allocation laws from a law‑of‑total‑variance decomposition, the method introduces an EPIG‑Tree score that guides branch placement using already computed rollouts, estimating occupancy‑ and score‑weighted value uncertainty. Empirical results show EPIG‑Tree reduces gradient MSE in cloned‑state control, improves frozen‑LLM gradient calibration, and outperforms flat GRPO and entropy branching in both single‑turn math and multi‑turn Wordle tasks.
arXiv:2607. 13988v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multi-turn agents solve complex tasks through extended sequences of tool interactions before producing a final answer, making credit assignment a fundamental challenge during post-training.
arXiv:2608. 16156v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Long-horizon large language model (LLM) agents are typically optimized with sparse terminal outcomes, making fine-grained credit assignment across multi-step interactions difficult.
arXiv:2610.08402v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multi-turn LLM agents often receive sparse task feedback across several interactions, while generating each response token by token. This creates two r...
TIGPO (Temporal Instance-Graph Policy Optimization) extends graph-based credit assignment for long-horizon LLM agents by maintaining a persistent transition graph per task across policy updates. It allocates rollout budgets to both new exploration and revisiting past tasks, pairing current rollouts with earlier ones to create cross‑temporal references that stabilize advantage estimation. Experiments on ALFWorld and WebShop show TIGPO consistently outperforms previous group‑based and graph‑based policy optimization methods.
arXiv:2607. 25659v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Rubric-based reinforcement learning enriches language model training by evaluating model outputs against explicit criteria.