arXiv:2610.19291v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: In so-called "Industry 4.0," integrated sensors, analytics tools, and other digital technologies supplement industrial workflows, potentiating enhanced...
By Lucas H. McCabe, Sarah Lukens, H. Howie Huang
arXiv:2606. 17904v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Language models increasingly serve as advisory systems in maintenance operations.
By Guillermo Gil de Avalle, Laura Maruster, Shaina Raza, Christos Emmanouilidis
DiagnosticIQ is a benchmark that tests large language models (LLMs) on translating engineer‑written symbolic rules into maintenance actions for industrial assets. It contains 6,690 multiple‑choice questions derived from 118 expert rule‑action pairs across 16 asset types, and includes five variants that probe different failure modes. The benchmark evaluates 29 LLMs and four embedding baselines, showing that while top models perform near the frontier, they exhibit brittleness under distractor expansion and structural perturbations.
By Devin Yasith De Silva, Dhaval Patel, Christodoulos Constantinides, Shuxin Lin, Nianjun Zhou, Dharmashankar Subramanian, Paul J Adams, Sal Rosato, Nicolas Constantinides, Deborah L. McGuinness, Jayant Kalagnanam
ToolRobustBench is a stage-wise diagnostic benchmark designed to evaluate and diagnose failures in tool‑calling agents, which are large language models that select tools, provide structured arguments, and interpret tool feedback. The benchmark aligns four perturbation families—tool‑interface, user‑intent, tool‑output/observation, and runtime‑environment—with the tool‑use pipeline, attributing failures to specific stages such as tool selection, schema grounding, argument binding, and feedback handling. Experiments across 15,456 instances, 7 models, and 16 local tools reveal that while overall performance is high, robustness degrades significantly, especially under tool‑output/observation perturbations, and mixed‑family perturbations produce non‑additive failure patterns.
By YiShan Zheng, Yuan Wu, Yi Chang
arXiv:2608.30685v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Large language model (LLM) agents are increasingly deployed in user-facing services that require iterative tool use under dynamic business conditions....
By Wei Chen, Peilun Zhou, Zhaoyu Hu, Jiajun Chai, Zhongni Hou, Yufei Zhang, Derong Xu, Guojun Yin, Wei Lin, Zhi Zheng, Tong Xu
arXiv:2508. 00923v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to answer health-related questions and support healthcare workflows, yet evidence for their safety still relies heavily on static benchmarks that can rapidly become obsolete or be optimized against.
By Jiazhen Pan (Cherise), Bailiang Jian (Cherise), Paul Hager (Cherise), Yundi Zhang (Cherise), Che Liu (Cherise), Friederike Jungmann (Cherise), Hongwei Bran Li (Cherise), Julian Canisius (Cherise), Chenyu You (Cherise), Junde Wu (Cherise), Jiayuan Zhu (Cherise), Fenglin Liu (Cherise), Yuyuan Liu (Cherise), Niklas Bubeck (Cherise), Moritz Knolle (Cherise), Chen (Cherise), Chen (Cherise), Christian Wachinger, Zhenyu Gong, Cheng Ouyang, Georgios Kaissis, Benedikt Wiestler, Daniel Rueckert
LiteTrajEval is a lightweight architecture designed for budget‑bounded trajectory evaluation of large‑language‑model agents. It creates compact domain‑specific rule profiles offline, preprocesses trajectories online to flag heuristic failure signals, and then uses a single rubric‑guided LLM judge to generate structured diagnostic reports. On public Magnetic‑One‑style and τ‑bench‑style datasets, LiteTrajEval improves failure‑localization alignment with human annotations by 20–35 percentage points and reduces cost and evaluation time by 6× and 8× respectively, and has been deployed in an enterprise agentic platform.
By Linh-An Phan, MingXue Wang, Guangyu Wu, Feng Pan, Zhaoyu Pang, Yanbin Zhang
arXiv:2607. 04686v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Tool calling is central to modern language model agents, but aggregate benchmark scores often hide where tool use fails.
By Harsh Soni
arXiv:2603. 28590v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) can generate chains of thought (CoTs) that are not always causally responsible for their final outputs.
By Han Wang, Yifan Sun, Brian Ko, Mann Talati, Jiawen Gong, Zimeng Li, Naicheng Yu, Xucheng Yu, Wei Shen, Vedant Jolly, Huan Zhang
arXiv:2606. 14119v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Fault diagnostics and recovery in smart factories is challenging because critical information is dispersed across manuals of multiple machines which are interconnected through the manufacturing process.
By Yash Pulse, Yong-Bin Kang, Abhik Banerjee, Abdur Forkan, Prem Prakash Jayaraman
arXiv:2606. 29377v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) improves the factuality of large language models by grounding responses in external evidence, yet real-world deployments remain fragile.
By Soroush Hashemifar, Havva Alizadeh Noughabi, Fattane Zarrinkalam, Ali Dehghantanha
arXiv:2607. 22555v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Medical diagnosis is a multi-stage process: extract facts, consult knowledge, generate a differential analysis, and select the best diagnosis with explanations.
By Mahmood Bayeshi, Veysel Kocaman, Muhammed Ali Naqvi, Yigit Gul, David Talby