arXiv Machine Learning

On the Convergence of Adam, Revisited

arXiv:2607. 03519v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We show that projected Adam for online optimization with arbitrary moment decay parameters $\beta_1,\beta_2\in[0,1)$ can have average regret bounded away from zero.

arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 2

Uniform a priori bounds and error analysis for the Adam stochastic gradient descent optimization method

The paper establishes uniform a priori bounds for the Adam optimizer, enabling an unconditional error analysis for a broad class of strongly convex stochastic optimization problems. Prior analyses were conditional, assuming Adam remained bounded, whereas this work removes that assumption. The results provide a rigorous foundation for Adam’s performance in training deep neural networks and other convex optimization tasks.

By Steffen Dereich, Thang Do, Arnulf Jentzen
arXiv Machine Learning
1d ago

How Far is Adam from Natural Gradient Descent?

The paper investigates how Adam’s update rule relates to natural gradient descent (NGD) by treating Adam as a diagonal empirical Fisher approximation with additional factors such as diagonal truncation, empirical label substitution, and temporal lag. Using a scale‑invariant metric, the authors quantify Adam’s geometric deviation from true NGD across four loss landscapes—well‑conditioned and ill‑conditioned linear regression, logistic regression, and a small neural network—finding that deviation is low in well‑conditioned settings but can reach about 10³ in ill‑conditioned or non‑convex scenarios. Despite higher geometric drift correlating with slower early optimization, Adam still achieves low final loss, and the improved empirical Fisher (iEF) yields more stable trajectories than the standard empirical Fisher (EF).

By Vihaan Paka-Hegde