arXiv:2607. 27383v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We establish the first convergence guarantees for the plain vector-form \emph{Adam} optimizer under heavy-tailed stochastic noise.
arXiv:2603. 09923v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Exponential moving averages (EMAs) are a central component of widely used adaptive optimizers such as Adam.
arXiv:2605. 18694v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Many tasks in modern machine learning are observed to involve heavy-tailed gradient noise during the optimization process.
arXiv:2506.04192v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Stochastic Frank-Wolfe is a classical optimization method for solving constrained optimization problems. On the other hand, recent optimizers...
arXiv:2606. 00520v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Many stochastic gradient methods are believed not to converge when the noise in stochastic gradients has only a finite $p$-th moment for $p\in\left(1,2\right)$, a setting known as the heavy-tailed noise assumption.
arXiv:2609.37787v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Adam is widely observed to remain stable even when the objective deviates significantly from global smoothness. Under the generalized smoothness framew...
arXiv:2602. 10204v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: We introduce MVN-Grad (Momentum on Variance-Normalized Gradients), an Adam-style optimizer that improves stability and performance by combining two complementary ideas: variance-based normalization and momentum applied after normalization.
The paper establishes uniform a priori bounds for the Adam optimizer, enabling an unconditional error analysis for a broad class of strongly convex stochastic optimization problems. Prior analyses were conditional, assuming Adam remained bounded, whereas this work removes that assumption. The results provide a rigorous foundation for Adam’s performance in training deep neural networks and other convex optimization tasks.
The paper presents a theoretical study of Adam in non‑stationary stochastic optimization, distinguishing two regimes: Euclidean tracking under adaptive strong monotonicity and high‑probability projected stationarity for general smooth objectives. It derives finite‑time bounds that decompose into initialization, objective drift, first‑moment tracking error (β₁), and preconditioner perturbation (β₂), and characterizes burn‑in times for constant and step‑decay schedules. The analysis reveals a noise–drift tradeoff, showing that in noise‑dominated settings Adam’s adaptive mechanisms can improve guarantees, while in drift‑dominated settings they may worsen tracking, potentially making vanilla SGD preferable.
arXiv:2609.30274v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Machine Learning and more specifically Deep Learning involves solving large scale nonconvex optimization problems. Several algorithms have been propose...
arXiv:2606. 28879v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The adaptive moment estimation algorithm, known as Adam, is widely used in modern machine learning, owing to its low per-iteration complexity and strong empirical performance.
arXiv:2505.20817v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Gradient clipping is widely used in language-model training to control heavy-tailed gradient noise and can improve convergence guarantees ove...
arXiv:2604. 08742v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Adam is widely used, but its convergence theory remains incomplete even in the deterministic full-batch setting because momentum and adaptive preconditioning are tightly coupled.