The paper proposes a fairness-aware Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) framework that tackles routing-induced bias by applying subgroup reweighting to correct data imbalance and gate entropy regularization to prevent the gating network from collapsing onto subgroup attributes. This end-to-end approach keeps expert utilization balanced and interpretable, offering a clear view of how subgroups are allocated across experts. Experiments show that the method improves fairness while maintaining competitive predictive performance.
By Sunhee Hwang
arXiv:2603. 21393v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: The widespread use of AI and ML models in sensitive areas raises significant concerns about fairness.
By Maryam Boubekraoui, Giordano d'Aloisio, Antinisca Di Marco
arXiv:2608.29247v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Deep neural networks remain highly vulnerable to adversarial perturbations, and adversarial training (AT) has become a widely used approach for improvi...
By Tejaswini Medi, Levan Mikeladze, Margret Keuper
arXiv:2607. 29441v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Many real-world systems rely on predictive models to inform decisions, and fairness concerns arise in both the prediction and decision stages.
By Yu Wang (Xinying), Violet (Xinying), Chen
arXiv:2602. 07764v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Multi-objective reinforcement learning (MORL) seeks to train agents capable of balancing conflicting objectives.
By Tanmay Ambadkar, Sourav Panda, Shreyash Kale, Jonathan Dodge, Abhinav Verma
The paper introduces CurriPO, a tree‑structured curriculum that automatically adapts to diverse user reward models in AI alignment tasks. By exploiting the natural hierarchy between easy‑ and hard‑to‑optimize reward models, CurriPO covers a broad user population in a single traversal, reusing previously incorporated reward models. Experiments on personalized continuous control show that CurriPO improves population satisfaction by 1.2–2.1× over the strongest baseline while cutting training time and better serving users traditionally underserved by conventional optimization.
By Taehyung Kim, Jongeun Choi
arXiv:2608. 13622v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Open-ended real-world interaction admits multiple valid behaviors: an agent may answer directly, ask for clarification, provide progress updates, or confirm before acting.
By Yongqi Tong, Tan Li Hui Faith, Choy Zhen Wen Marcus, Zhou Jin, Kewei Fu, Jiang-Ming Yang, Jianshe Li, Xin Zhang
arXiv:2607. 29559v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reinforcement Learning (RL) systems are typically trained using a single, well-specified scalar reward function.
By Manith Adikari, Bei Peng, Samuele Vinanzi, Angelo Cangelosi
The paper introduces CurriPO, a tree‑structured curriculum that adapts to diverse user reward models in AI alignment. By automatically building a curriculum that branches and reuses reward models, it addresses the problem of users whose reward models are hard to optimize, a group often underserved by conventional methods. Experiments on personalized continuous control demonstrate that CurriPO improves population satisfaction by 1.2–2.1× over the best baseline while cutting training time.
arXiv:2408. 05885v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Generative Flow Networks (GFlowNets) have been shown effective to generate combinatorial objects with desired properties.
By Puhua Niu, Shili Wu, Mingzhou Fan, Xiaoning Qian
arXiv:2606. 18111v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Fairness is an important aspect of decision-making in multi-objective reinforcement learning (MORL), where policies must ensure both optimality and equity across multiple, potentially conflicting objectives.
By Umer Siddique, Peilang Li, Yongcan Cao
arXiv:2606. 08779v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reinforcement Learning (RL) has emerged as a pivotal post-training paradigm, yet it frequently suffers from unpredictable sub-optimum performance or even training collapses.
By Jiashun Liu, Runze Liu, Xu Wan, Jing Liang, Hongyao Tang, Ling Pan