arXiv:2607. 23361v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Language generation in the limit is an elegant model introduced by Kleinberg and Mullainathan [KM24] to formally study language generation by an algorithm that learns solely based on example strings.
By Debmalya Panigrahi, Fan Wei, Ian Zhang
arXiv:2608. 01320v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Language generation in the limit is a theoretical framework for studying how a generator can learn to produce new valid strings from a stream of positive examples.
By Ziyi Cai, Shuangping Li, Yiheng Shen, Kangning Wang, Peng Zhang
arXiv:2606. 25777v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We initiate a resource-aware theory of \textit{language generation in the limit} under the minimal constraint of space efficiency.
By Nicolas Flammarion, Chirag Pabbaraju, Hristo Papazov, Miltiadis Stouras, Ola Svensson
arXiv:2601. 21237v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Kleinberg and Mullainathan recently proposed a formal framework for studying the phenomenon of language generation, called language generation in the limit.
By Aaron Li, Ian Zhang
arXiv:2605. 11644v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Positive data can show that two tuple occurrences share a successful sentence context without certifying that they are safely interchangeable.
By Takayuki Kuriyama
arXiv:2609.36663v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: We present GenLimitLib, a source-aligned Lean 4 library for language generation in the limit. Introduced by Kleinberg and Mullainathan at NeurIPS 2024,...
By Shuangping Li, Peng Zhang
arXiv:2606. 14688v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: AI systems coupled to proof assistants now generate formal mathematics at scale, and the gap between what a checker can verify and what a mathematician would value has become the binding constraint.
By Xiaoyu Li, Andi Han, Dai Shi, Zheng Gao, Jiaojiao Jiang, Junbin Gao
arXiv:2606. 07623v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: This paper develops a model-theoretic framework for verifying context-conditioned language-model behavior by replacing benchmark labels with finite semantic certificates.
By Faruk Alpay, Hamdi Alakkad
The paper reports on a large‑scale verified search experiment using a 30B language model on a laptop, evaluating three operator packages—schematic notebooks, named obstacles, and behavioural repulsion—in a factorial design across nine construction problems. Results show that the full composition of operators closes the seed‑to‑record gap more effectively than any single component, increases construction‑hash diversity, and that memory plus repulsion consistently avoids collapse. A frontier proposer achieves similar gains in far fewer samples, but the search ultimately stalls near a plateau where the reference family is adopted and optimized only when provided as code.
By Roberto I. Ono Filho
arXiv:2606. 19788v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We present CombEval, a dynamic benchmark for evaluating combinatorial counting in large language models.
By Yuxu Zhou, Ond\v{r}ej Ku\v{z}elka, Yuyi Wang, Yuanhong Wang, Yi Chang
arXiv:2607. 11606v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We study how little extra information is needed to make adversarial language learning possible.
By Moses Charikar, Jon Kleinberg, Chirag Pabbaraju
arXiv:2608. 15979v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models produce outputs presented as discoveries - new proofs, conjectures, or molecules.
By Eric Xie, Wenqian Ye, Aidong Zhang