In value-based reinforcement learning, improving the accuracy of policy evaluation has been shown to improve downstream policy optimization performance. The widely adopted family of approximations rel...
arXiv:2603. 23461v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: We study reinforcement learning (RL) with linear function approximation in Markov Decision Processes (MDPs) satisfying \emph{linear Bellman completeness} -- a fundamental setting where the Bellman backup of any linear value function remains linear.
By Zakaria Mhammedi, Alexander Rakhlin, Nneka Okolo
The paper introduces a framework for reinforcement learning in Markov decision processes where policies are ordered by the information they provide, allowing data from one policy to estimate the performance of others. An epoch‑based algorithm is developed for infinite‑horizon average‑cost MDPs with continuous state and action spaces, achieving regret that scales with the width of the policy class’s information order. The authors apply the framework to lost‑sales inventory, dual‑sourcing, and state‑dependent queueing systems, demonstrating improved regret bounds and empirical performance without requiring global convexity or specific arrival‑rate structures.
By Zhongjun Zhang, Shipra Agrawal, Ilan Lobel, Sean R. Sinclair, Christina Lee Yu
Limiting‑Kernel Q(λ) (LKQL) is an off‑policy value estimator that blends n‑step truncation with a long‑horizon approximation based on the limiting kernel. It maintains the computational efficiency of n‑step methods while improving policy evaluation accuracy, especially for long‑horizon tasks. The authors prove faster convergence of LKQL’s operator under aperiodicity and near‑on‑policy conditions, and demonstrate empirical gains on MuJoCo continuous‑control benchmarks.
By Tolga Ok, Arman Sharifi Kolarijani, Peyman Mohajerin Esfahani, Mohamad Amin Sharifi Kolarijani
arXiv:2606. 00680v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Offline reinforcement learning (RL) aims to optimize policies from pre-collected datasets.
By Hongqiang Lin, Pengfei Wang, Nenggan Zheng
arXiv:2601.10418v2 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: We study tabular finite-horizon reinforcement learning problems with multiple steps of lookahead information. Before acting, the learner obse...
By Nadav Merlis
The paper introduces state abstractions that preserve the difference of Q‑functions for offline reinforcement learning, aiming to exclude irrelevant dynamics from rich state data. It proposes a dynamic generalization of the R‑learner that uses orthogonal estimation and sparse learning to estimate the Q‑function contrast, achieving faster convergence and consistency under a margin condition. Experiments on simulated and simulator‑augmented real data show variance reductions and demonstrate that the necessary information for sequential decision‑making can be smaller than that required for full state prediction.
By Defu Cao, Angela Zhou
arXiv:2606. 10979v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Many Markov decision processes (MDPs) in operations research have feasible actions that are state dependent and defined implicitly by various operational constraints.
By Yi Chen (Lucy), Rushuai Yang (Lucy), Qiang Chen (Lucy), Dongyan (Lucy), Huo
arXiv:2607. 01741v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Reinforcement Learning (RL) is a sequential decision-making framework in which an agent learns optimal policies through interaction with an environment by maximizing cumulative rewards.
By Stefano Masini, Cecilia Viscardi, Michela Baccini
The paper introduces a model‑free continuous‑time reinforcement learning algorithm that learns from a fixed batch of discrete‑time off‑policy data. It builds on the PhiBE‑Q framework to create a PhiBE‑PI policy iteration that uses a single state‑action critic, avoiding explicit drift or diffusion estimation. The authors provide a local end‑to‑end suboptimality guarantee under linear function approximation, analyze error propagation from discretization, function approximation, and finite samples, and reveal a bias‑variance trade‑off where finer time discretization can worsen statistical error.
By Chaorui Yao, Yuming Paul Zhang, Lin Yang, Yuhua Zhu
arXiv:2607. 17823v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reinforcement Learning is a cornerstone technique for modern large reasoning models.
By Riccardo Poiani, Martino Bernasconi, Andrea Celli
arXiv:2506. 00818v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Offline reinforcement learning for longitudinal studies often faces two linked challenges: rewards may be binary or bounded, and reward observations may be available only for a subset of trajectories or time points even when the corresponding state-action-next-state histories are available.
By Sinian Zhang, Kaicheng Zhang, Ziping Xu, Zongqi Xia, Jue Hou, Tianxi Cai, Doudou Zhou