arXiv:2607. 05029v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Persistent memory has enabled large language model (LLM) agents to store factual knowledge, prior decisions, reasoning histories, tool usage information, and context.
By Neeraj Karamchandani, Piyush Nagasubramaniam, Sencun Zhu, Dinghao Wu
arXiv:2607. 29167v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Long-term memory lets large language model(LLM) agents reuse prior preferences and work flows, but it also turns untrusted observations into persistent action context.
By Jinghan Xu, Yiyong Xiao, Wanru Shao, Hankai Liu, Xinjin Li
Persistent memory has enabled large language model (LLM) agents to store factual knowledge, prior decisions, reasoning histories, tool usage information, and context. While this has improved the agent's functionality and continuity across tasks, it has also introduced a new attack surface: the agent's own reasoning history.
arXiv:2606. 12703v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) agents increasingly run with persistent memory that accumulates across user sessions.
By Tarun Sharma
The paper proposes the Analytical Memory Unit (AMU), a memory schema that attaches a full derivation (lineage) graph to every cached result in enterprise AI agents. By gating retrieval with a policy that requires authorization for every column touched, the authors prove that sensitive columns cannot be leaked through derived results, achieving up to 90% lineage completeness to eliminate leakage. Experiments show lineage‑gated retrieval removes 18.8‑25.5% of cross‑department leakage while maintaining 81.5‑82.6% memory reuse with minimal overhead, and a real‑agent proof‑of‑concept demonstrates zero leaks over multiple interactions.
By Venkata M Sangaraju, Sudhir Vissa
arXiv:2606. 06054v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Personal AI agents increasingly rely on long-term memory to provide persistent personalization across sessions.
By Jiawen Zhang, Kejia Chen, Jiachen Ma, Yangfan Hu, Lipeng He, Yechao Zhang, Jian Liu, Xiaohu Yang, Tianwei Zhang, Ruoxi Jia
arXiv:2608. 10509v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Shared memory helps language-model agents reuse information across long workflows, yet relevant evidence may not be admissible for a particular agent or action.
By Yiqi Wang, Zihao Yan, Jiaqi Zhang, Zhangkai Wu, Mingkai Zheng, Zequn Sun, Yanming Zhu, Taotao Cai
arXiv:2606. 26627v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language model agents increasingly query databases, search document collections, call external APIs, remember past interactions, and act on a user's behalf.
By Nada Lahjouji, Ashwin Gerard Colaco
Shared memory helps language-model agents reuse information across long workflows, yet relevant evidence may not be admissible for a particular agent or action. Because restrictions propagate through derivations, summaries can conceal private, poisoned, untrusted, or revoked sources, enabling unauthorized reads or unsafe actions.
arXiv:2606. 08539v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: AI agents increasingly take consequential actions -- shell commands, cloud operations, and arbitrary tool-calls -- so a trust layer must decide, per action, whether to allow, warn, block, or escalate.
By Chenglin Yang
arXiv:2608. 03844v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Memory-augmented LLM agents rely on rich context for long-horizon reasoning and acting, yet their memory modules expose a persistent attack surface for malicious records, making the study of memory poisoning threats imperative.
By Jiaming Chen, Yisen Gao, Yanping Li, Zifan Liu, Yumeng Zhang, Jun Zhang
arXiv:2604. 16548v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The emergence of writable, cross-session persistent memory in LLM agents introduces a qualitatively different threat landscape from conventional input-centric security concerns, characterized by three properties: persistence, statefulness, and propagation.
By Zehao Lin, Xixuan Hao, Renyu Fu, Shaobo Cui, Kai Chen, Chunyu Li, Zhiyu Li, Feiyu Xiong