arXiv AI

Era by Eon: Benchmarking Enterprise Agents on Hidden Knowledge

The "Era by Eon" benchmark tests enterprise agents by presenting questions that specify answer rules and require code to compute answers from generated company data. While top models can answer most questions, the benchmark introduces eight new templates that rely on hidden facts not explicitly stated in any document, making the task harder. Evaluation of 12 agents shows that only the best agent correctly answers 18 of 24 attempts, with many questions remaining largely unsolved.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Sep 24

Era by Eon: Benchmarking Enterprise Agents on Hidden Knowledge

The Era by Eon benchmark tests enterprise agents by presenting questions that specify answer rules and require code to compute answers from a company’s data. In the original benchmark, top models answered 22–25 of 27 questions, barely distinguishing performance. The updated benchmark adds eight templates that rely on hidden facts not explicitly stated in any question or document, forcing agents to infer information from indirect data. Twelve agents were evaluated, with the best achieving 18 of 24 correct answers, while the hardest questions—requiring selection among similar records—were answered correctly only 1 out of 84 attempts across all agents.

arXiv AI
Sep 11

The Era by Eon Benchmark: A Generated Enterprise Estate with Exact Ground Truth for Benchmarking LLM Agents

The Era by Eon Benchmark is a new dataset for evaluating large language model agents that interact with enterprise tools. It constructs a complete fictional company with product simulators, internal databases, and benchmark questions, all generated from a shared entity graph to ensure consistency. Exact answer keys are computed from the generated records, allowing precise grading and validation of realism and adversarial robustness across 23 simulated companies.

By Benjamin Gruenbaum, Doron Porat, Assaf Natanzon, Roy Zavida, Chen Dinachi, Or Itzahary
arXiv AI
2d ago

AX is the New AEO

arXiv:2609.34951v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: In 2023, AI models answered from training data and hallucinated when it ran out, and businesses were told to seed that knowledge. Models' training...

By Ido Finder, Assaf Elovic, Gad Shalev, Liad Yosef
arXiv AI
Sep 7

Agentic Context Cracking: Token-Efficient Data Reasoning Agents via Adaptive Structuring of Unstructured Data

The paper introduces Agentic Context Cracking, a technique that adaptively and speculatively structures unstructured data during the reasoning process of large language model agents. By creating a sub-agent that extracts useful structure from documents as they are opened, the method reduces the need to repeatedly read large files, cutting token usage by 53% on the FanOutQA benchmark while maintaining accuracy. Over time, more queries are answered using the accumulated structured data, approaching the efficiency of a database lookup.

By Milad Rezaei Hajidehi, Qitong Wang, Stratos Idreos
arXiv AI
Sep 18

Continual Enterprise World Model Discovery in Dynamic Systems

The paper introduces a method for continual enterprise world model discovery, enabling an agent to learn and adapt to business rules in dynamic systems without prior knowledge. Using a ServiceNow environment called EnterpriseWorldShift, the authors evaluate their Continual Discovery Agent (CDA) across four rule-modification scenarios—discovery, revision, extension, and retirement—showing that CDA predicts rule effects more accurately than lookup-based approaches, improving IoU by up to 8.98 points. The agent can answer queries from its internal model without querying the live system.

By Shambhavi Mishra, David Vazquez, Perouz Taslakian, Marco Pedersoli, Jose Dolz, Issam H. Laradji
arXiv AI
Sep 10

DI-Bench: Systematically Generating In-Domain Data Intelligence Benchmarks for Enterprise Agents

DI-Bench is a pipeline that automatically creates realistic data intelligence benchmarks for enterprise agents by linking data tables, dimensions, metrics, and documents into an artifact graph. It generates questions that combine structured data queries with knowledge retrieval, validates answers via query execution and LLM-generated questions, and has produced a 731-task benchmark covering knowledge retrieval, analytical computation, and rule‑grounded reasoning. Evaluation of four models on this benchmark shows that only 32% accuracy is achieved on computational tasks that involve business rules modifying the computation.

By Jiangyun Zhang, Kristen Surrao, Torpong Nitayanont, Yupei Zhang, Roopali Singh, Zhiyu Chen, Julia Huang, Zhou Tang, Shayan Ali Akbar, Omar Alonso, Erwin Cornejo, Yuan Li, Yi Zhang
arXiv AI
Aug 28

Why RAGs Hallucinate: Penalty-Aware Evaluation of Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems with Knowledge-Gap Canaries

The paper introduces a penalty‑aware evaluation framework for Retrieval‑Augmented Generation (RAG) systems that uses asymmetric scoring, knowledge‑gap canaries, and a failure‑attribution pipeline. Applying this framework to three commercial RAG products and a baseline on SimpleQA‑Verified, the authors find that while overall accuracy is similar across systems, canary violation rates vary dramatically, showing that systems differ more in when they answer than in what they answer. The study demonstrates that penalty‑aware scoring can reorder system rankings and is robust across different penalty settings.

By Alden Do Rosario, Hussein Younes, Felipe Pires