arXiv Machine Learning

Pro-Active Inference

The paper introduces Pro-Active Inference (PAI), a method for efficiently estimating a population mean when only a subset of outcomes can be observed. PAI proactively selects which observation to label next from a covariate pool, updating machine‑learning predictions online, and provides finite‑sample unbiasedness, asymptotic validity, and an improved variance estimator. Experiments on eight datasets show that PAI outperforms Sequential Active Inference in most settings, while diagnostics reveal when additional adaptivity is beneficial or detrimental.

arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 11

Demystifying Prediction Powered Inference

arXiv:2601. 20819v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Machine learning predictions are increasingly used to supplement incomplete or costly-to-measure outcomes in fields such as biomedical research, environmental science, and social science.

By Yilin Song, Dan M. Kluger, Harsh Parikh, Tian Gu
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 10

Prediction-Powered Active Testing

arXiv:2607. 08347v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Active testing provides a label--efficient approach to risk estimation by adaptively selecting which test points should be labelled.

By Kianoosh Ashouritaklimi, Valentin Kilian, Daolang Huang, Tom Rainforth, Fran\c{c}ois Caron
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jul 9

Prediction-Powered Active Testing

Active testing provides a label--efficient approach to risk estimation by adaptively selecting which test points should be labelled. However, existing estimators fail to exploit the informative predictions of powerful black--box models, even though such predictions are increasingly available in settings where labels remain expensive.

arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 21

Fixed-Size Active Statistical Inference

The paper introduces Conditional Poisson Sampling (CPS) as a fixed-size alternative to Poisson Sampling (PS) for variance reduction in statistical inference. CPS can replace PS in multivariate Z-estimation problems, including convex M-estimation, without increasing asymptotic variance and often improving it when predictions are imperfect. The authors demonstrate these benefits on synthetic and real datasets and provide a Python package for CPS implementation.

By Erik Skalnes, Michael Oberst
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 1

Prediction-Powered Conditional Inference

arXiv:2603.05575v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We study prediction-powered conditional inference in the setting where labeled data are scarce, unlabeled covariates are abundant, and a blac...

By Yang Sui, Jin Zhou, Hua Zhou, Xiaowu Dai
arXiv AI
Aug 20

Debiased Inference for AI-Generated Data without Gold-Standard Labels: Identification via Multiple Imperfect Measurements

The paper introduces Debiased Inference with Multiple Imperfect Measurements (DMM), a framework that uses several error‑prone AI measurements to perform valid downstream statistical inference without requiring costly gold‑standard labels. By assuming conditional independence of the measurements given the true label and unit‑level features, DMM leverages CP decomposition and semiparametric theory to prove consistency and asymptotic normality of its estimator. Simulations demonstrate that DMM yields valid inference and can improve efficiency when additional imperfect measurements are available, and the authors provide diagnostics for the key independence assumption.

By Naoki Egami, Sooahn Shin
arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 16

INCONVENIENT: A Benchmark to Assess LLM Generalization Capabilities from Convenience Samples

INCONVENIENT is a new benchmark that evaluates how machine‑learning models, especially large language models, generalize when trained on convenience samples that bias feature–target relationships. Unlike prior distribution‑shift tests that rely on natural domain splits, INCONVENIENT explicitly perturbs these relationships while keeping the deployment population unchanged, allowing controlled study of shift severity and direction. The benchmark covers 200 tabular classification and regression datasets and produces about 15,500 shifted training distributions, revealing significant performance degradation.

By Sara Rezaeimanesh, Chad Klochko, Kundan Thind, Mohammad Ghassemi