Merchant risk control at large payment platforms screens tens of millions of merchants daily, where false positives harm legitimate merchants and false negatives leave harmful activity undetected. The hardest cases require jointly understanding a merchant's textual profile and long behavioral sequence.
arXiv:2606. 06286v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models can reproduce training data, but existing memorization evaluations mostly measure whether models can be forced to do so, rather than whether they do so under ordinary use.
By Gianluca Barmina, Peter Schneider-Kamp, Lukas Galke Poech
arXiv:2607. 20734v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: As LLMs become more capable, they are increasingly deployed as collaborative agents, taking on user-delegated tasks through iterative interaction.
By Jihoon Tack, Philippe Laban, Jennifer Neville
arXiv:2608. 13573v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large Language Model (LLM) serving has become a critical cloud workload, and realistic traces are essential for motivating and benchmarking serving systems.
By William Nixon, Jon Durbin, Florian Standhartinger, Haryadi S. Gunawi, Juncheng Yang
arXiv:2607. 17586v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Money mule accounts are critical facilitators of financial fraud, yet detecting them at scale remains challenging due to the heterogeneous nature of transactional and behavioural data.
By Yuge Zhang, Yuanxing Zhang, Yichao Jin, Khairul Amsyar Mohd Razis, Nicholas Qi An Choo, Kai Yin Anders Wong, Xinyan Tang, Kenneth Zhu Ke, Wee Keong Dennis Lee, Jingyuan Zhao
arXiv:2605. 22779v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Production systems generate millions of log lines daily, yet most anomaly detectors operate at the session or window-level, flagging groups of lines rather than identifying the specific message responsible.
By Huanchi Wang, Zihang Huang, Yifang Tian, Kristina Dzeparoska, Hans-Arno Jacobsen, Alberto Leon-Garcia
arXiv:2604. 22891v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: LLM-as-a-Judge has become a dominant approach in automated evaluation systems, playing critical roles in model alignment, leaderboard construction, quality control, and so on.
By Jinming Yang, Zheng Hu, Chuxian Qiu, Zhenyu Deng, Xinshan Jiao, Tao Zhou
arXiv:2606. 07624v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: This discussion argues that sequential statistical inference can naturally contribute to LLM trustworthiness.
By Yao Xie
arXiv:2607. 01208v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Language models deployed in high-stakes roles can potentially favor certain entities, brands, or viewpoints, steering user decisions at scale.
By Shayan Talaei, Abhinav Chinta, Devvrit Khatri, Amin Karbasi, Azalia Mirhoseini, Amin Saberi
arXiv:2606. 27634v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Small Language Models (SLMs) are increasingly being considered for deployment on edge devices such as laptops, enabling private, low-latency, and locally personalized applications.
By Thomas S. Paula, Lucas S. Kupssinsk\"u, Rodrigo C. Barros
arXiv:2601. 22025v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Evaluating Large Language Model (LLM) applications differs from conventional software testing because outputs are probabilistic, semantically variable, and sensitive to prompt and model changes.
By Daniel Commey
arXiv:2607. 01867v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The use of LLMs in software development has become increasingly widespread on tasks such as code generation and summarization.
By Yongyi Ji, Jiaji Wang, Yi Zhou, Fuxiang Chen, Hongji Yang