arXiv AI

From Abductive Explanations to Global Logical Rules for Node Classification in SGCs

The paper introduces a logic-based framework that extracts global logical rules for node classification in Simple Graph Convolution (SGC) networks. It uses minimal abductive explanations—small sets of node-feature pairs that preserve a node’s predicted class—as an intermediate step. Decision trees trained on these explanations yield compact global rules that retain high fidelity to the original SGC model, as demonstrated on benchmark datasets.

arXiv AI
Aug 25

SLogic: Subgraph-Informed Logical Rule Learning for Knowledge Graph Completion

SLogic introduces a subgraph-informed approach to logical rule learning for knowledge graph completion, assigning query-dependent scores to rules instead of a single global weight. The framework uses a context-aware scoring function that evaluates the importance of a rule based on the local subgraph around the query’s head entity, aligning with the specificity principle of commonsense reasoning. Experiments on benchmark datasets demonstrate that SLogic performs competitively with other rule-based methods while producing human-readable, query-specific explanations.

By Trung Hoang Le, Tran Cao Son, Ishtiaq Ahmed, Huiping Cao
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 15

Neuron Activation-based Computation of Logical Explanations for Deep Neural Networks

The paper introduces a flexible symbolic framework that efficiently computes logical explanations for deep neural networks by parameterizing explanations with internal neuron activations and leveraging general-purpose logical engines like SMT solvers. Unlike previous methods that rely on specialized verifiers or are limited to individual input features, this approach is not restricted in shape and can scale to deep architectures. Experiments on image recognition and medical benchmarks demonstrate improved computational efficiency and the ability to explain networks that were previously intractable for logic-based methods.

By Tom\'a\v{s} Kol\'arik, Faezeh Labbaf, Fabrizio Leopardi, Grigory Fedyukovich, Michael Wand, Natasha Sharygina
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 7

A Comparative Study of Counterfactual Explainers for Graph Neural Networks Enabling Multiple Types of Graph Edit

The paper presents a comparative analysis of six state‑of‑the‑art counterfactual explainers for graph neural networks, focusing on methods that can both add and remove edges to alter model predictions. It evaluates these explainers across diverse real‑world and synthetic datasets, covering binary and multi‑class graph and node classification tasks, using a range of quantitative and qualitative metrics. The study highlights the trade‑offs between explanation size, coverage, and quality, aiming to pinpoint each method’s strengths and weaknesses to inform future research.

By Maria Myrto Villia, Filippos Gouidis, Theodore Patkos, Panos Trahanias
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 28

SLM-Conditioned Hierarchical Relation Routing for Labeled Property Graph Learning

The paper introduces SLM-Conditioned Hierarchical Relation Routing, a graph neural network architecture that incorporates a small language model to guide message selection in labeled property graphs. It combines structural states, node and relationship property encodings, and relationship types into messages, then uses a parameter‑efficient language model to generate target‑conditioned routing queries that filter relevant messages and route information across relation‑level summaries. The resulting representation updates a topology anchor with bounded residuals, preserving structural evidence while allowing contextual semantic information to influence predictions, and offers interpretable analysis at both neighbor and relationship‑type levels.

By Michal Podstawski
arXiv AI
Aug 17

Overcoming Shortcut Learning in Graph Neural Networks through Active Explanation Guidance

arXiv:2608. 14121v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) can solve prediction tasks by unintentionally exploiting shortcuts---that is, edges, nodes, and features that correlate with but are not causal for the prediction---which compromise their reliability in out-of-distribution tasks.

By Taraneh Younesian, Steve Azzolin, Antonio Longa, Francesco Ferrini, Vincenzo Marco De Luca, Stefano Teso