arXiv:2501. 04339v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We introduce the Deep Convolutional Interpreter for Time Series (DCIts), a deep-learning architecture for nonlinear multivariate time series that provides sample-specific, locally interpretable descriptions of the underlying interaction structure.
By Domjan Baric, Davor Horvatic
arXiv:2606. 29951v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Interpretable Mesomorphic Neural Networks (IMNs) offer a promising framework that combines the predictive power of deep neural networks with the interpretability of linear models.
By Hugo L. Hammer, Vajira Thambawita, Kristoffer Herland Hellton, P{\aa}l Halvorsen
arXiv:2606. 09404v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Feature interactions drive much of the predictive power of machine learning models, yet existing explanation methods only detect and quantify interactions without revealing their functional form, or visualize only restricted interaction types.
By Timo Hei{\ss}, Julia Herbinger, Bernd Bischl, Giuseppe Casalicchio
arXiv:2606. 20035v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Many dense prediction networks rely on additive feature transformations and model higher-order feature interactions only implicitly.
By Ziyuan Li, Osamah Sufyan, Uwe Jaekel, Babette Dellen
arXiv:2502. 07209v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) seek to solve partial differential equations (PDEs) with deep learning.
By Shaghayegh Fazliani, Zachary Frangella, Madeleine Udell
arXiv:2607. 09235v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The current state of the art in AI/ML rests on deep neural architectures, which, in general, suffer from a lack of interpretability.
By Jayadeva, Madhur Aswani
arXiv:2606. 19850v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Deep neural networks (DNNs) exhibit attractive performance in various fields but often suffer from low interpretability.
By Yasutoshi Kishimoto, Kota Yamanishi, Takuya Matsuda, Shinichi Shirakawa
arXiv:2511. 15941v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Tabular data underpins decisions across science, industry, and public services.
By David Bonet, Mar\c{c}al Comajoan Cara, Alvaro Calafell, Daniel Mas Montserrat, Alexander G. Ioannidis
Inherently interpretable classifiers for tabular data typically rely on sparse features, rules, or patterns that users can inspect directly. The marginal feature-screening step common to these methods can discard variables whose predictive value emerges only through joint configurations with other variables.
arXiv:2607. 07060v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Inherently interpretable classifiers for tabular data typically rely on sparse features, rules, or patterns that users can inspect directly.
By Srikumar Krishnamoorthy
Additive models buy interpretability by forbidding feature interactions, a constraint that neural instantiations enforce architecturally. We introduce the quadrilateral loss, a differentiable penalty that treats additivity as a measurable behavior instead: a second-order mixed difference on pairs of training points swapping one coordinate, which vanishes if and only if the coordinate carries no interaction, remains informative for piecewise-linear networks, and equals in expectation the per-coordinate interaction mass of the interventional Shapley-GAM.
arXiv:2607. 08641v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Over the last few years, there has been an increased interest in making machine learning models more interpretable.
By Yann Claes, Pierre Geurts, V\^an Anh Huynh-Thu