The paper introduces a multi‑agent platform built on CrewAI for conversational business intelligence. Five specialized agents process natural language queries, retrieve and analyze data, generate visualizations via the Model Context Protocol, and deliver actionable insights. The system includes a defense‑in‑depth security architecture, a query parameterization mechanism, and achieves 95.3% functional accuracy with a 24‑second mean latency, outperforming a single‑agent baseline by 22.6 percentage points in accuracy and 20.2% in quality.
By Manoj N M, Vijayakrishna S, Manjunath Srinivas, Rohit Pahan
arXiv:2606. 08806v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used in autonomous software testing; however, AI-generated test artifacts often suffer from hallucinations, compliance violations, security risks, and limited explainability.
By Dimple Bajaj, Deepak Khetan
The paper investigates the reliability of software produced by agentic AI by comparing AI-generated versions of ten well-known Linux utilities to their human-written counterparts. Using fuzz testing (both black-box and coverage-guided AFL++), the authors find that AI-generated code is often as reliable or more reliable than the latest human versions, with fewer memory errors but a higher incidence of hangs. The study emphasizes that robust AI-generated software requires careful prompting, skilled human oversight, and that the AI workflow can serve as a cost-effective specification for sustainable code.
By Ayesha Shafique, Barton P. MIller, Elisa R. Heymann
arXiv:2606. 17915v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Big-Data-as-a-Service (BDaaS) platforms require re liable automation across data ingestion, cleaning, feature engi neering, model development, deployment, and post-deployment monitoring.
By Aueaphum Aueawatthanaphisut, Badri Raj Lamichhane
arXiv:2607. 16345v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Modern agentic systems increasingly rely on skills: installable packages of natural language and code that teach an LLM agent to perform a domain task.
By Tejas Singh Anand, Yuet Ying Christina Wang, Wanting Jiang, Steve Masson, Tian Zheng, Bingjie Zhou
The paper introduces Agentic Cloud Workflow Engineering, a framework that converts natural‑language agentic cloud‑engineering tasks into validated code repositories and verified cloud deployments. It separates graph engineering for long‑horizon workflow progression, loop engineering for bounded diagnosis and recovery, and agent harness engineering for zero‑trust execution. Experiments on Google Cloud show that executions either produce a verified deployment or an auditable terminal failure within bounded recovery limits.
By Sagar Srinivas Sakhinana, Venkataramana Runkana
arXiv:2609.38652v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Agentic AI systems increasingly rely on cloud-hosted large language models for planning, tool use, and iterative execution, raising concerns about API...
By Yizhou Han, Di Wu, Dhananjay Saikumar, Blesson Varghese
arXiv:2607. 28629v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The rapid transition from reactive large language models (LLMs) to persistent, action-capable systems has exposed critical gaps in the architectural understanding of Agentic AI, particularly in separating inference, orchestration, and execution layers for autonomous AI agents.
By Konstantinos I. Roumeliotis, Ranjan Sapkota
The paper introduces a multi‑agent framework that transforms natural‑language MLOps tasks into verified repositories and operational cloud deployments. It uses a stateful Graph Orchestrator to coordinate agents for repository generation, review, execution, verification, release, and monitoring, ensuring lifecycle transitions only occur when supported by verifiable evidence. The framework, implemented on Google Cloud Platform, demonstrates prevention of unsupported transitions and drives each run toward a verified deployment or an auditable failure.
By Sagar Srinivas Sakhinana, Venkataramana Runkana
arXiv:2606. 16000v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We introduce GRACE-DS, a Guarded Reward-guided Agent Correction Environment in Data Science for pre-deployment evaluation of LLM-powered AutoML agents.
By Aleksandr Tsymbalov, Danis Zaripov, Artem Epifanov, Anastasya Palienko
The paper introduces AOI (Autonomous Operations Intelligence), a multi‑agent framework that treats automated site reliability tasks as a structured trajectory learning problem under security constraints. It combines a trainable diagnostic system using Group Relative Policy Optimization, a read‑write separated execution architecture, and a Failure Trajectory Closed‑Loop Evolver that turns unsuccessful runs into corrective supervision. On the AIOpsLab benchmark, AOI achieves significant performance gains, including a 66.3% best@5 success rate and improved average metrics on unseen fault types.
By Pei Yang, Wanyi Chen, Asuka Yuxi Zheng, Xueqian Li, Xiang Li, Haoqin Tu, Jie Xiao, Yifan Pang, Dongdong Zhang, Fuqiang Li, Alfred Long, Lynn Ai, Eric Yang, Bill Shi, Yifan Chen, Shuhan Sun
arXiv:2607. 16388v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large-scale AI datacenter platforms comprise thousands of heterogeneous hardware components whose validation requires comprehensive fault injection test plans.
By Mohammed-Khalil Ghali, Saurabh Kulkarni, Prathamesh Kulkarni, Rohan Kulkarni, Sangwon Yoon, Daehan Won