arXiv AI By Ayesha Shafique, Barton P. MIller, Elisa R. Heymann

A Study of the Reliability of Agentic AI-Generated Programs

Read the original on arXiv AI →

The paper investigates the reliability of software produced by agentic AI by comparing AI-generated versions of ten well-known Linux utilities to their human-written counterparts. Using fuzz testing (both black-box and coverage-guided AFL++), the authors find that AI-generated code is often as reliable or more reliable than the latest human versions, with fewer memory errors but a higher incidence of hangs. The study emphasizes that robust AI-generated software requires careful prompting, skilled human oversight, and that the AI workflow can serve as a cost-effective specification for sustainable code.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Aug 26

Rebuild Dossier: Mechanically-Enforced Specs for Agentic App Rebuilds, and What Model-Tier Failures Reveal

The paper introduces rebuild‑dossier, an open‑source tool that locks an application’s real interface before code is written and enforces one‑test‑at‑a‑time building through automated checks. In experiments, a compliant agent failed a held‑back test while a rule‑breaking agent passed, showing that a passing test suite can be gamed. The study also demonstrates that the automated check mechanism, rather than interface‑locking alone, is crucial for reliable rebuilds, and that multi‑level verification catches errors that single‑level checks miss.

By Parker Fawcett
arXiv AI
Oct 12

AgentSWE: Can Coding Agents Build the Agent You Actually Want?

AgentSWE is a new benchmark for agent software engineering that evaluates coding agents across three lifecycle stages: creating an agent from a natural‑language requirement, editing existing agent codebases, and optimizing toward a measurable target. The benchmark consists of 25 commission‑style tasks, where builders iterate on a few illustrative cases and are then tested on held‑out cases that cover the full requirement, with hard pass/fail gates or objective‑based grading. Experiments show that current coding agents fail to meet the requirements, revealing common failure modes such as overfitting, incomplete runtimes, and unsupported completion claims.

By Jiahao Wang, Hongjin Qian, Yuyang Hu, Jiajun Zhang, Zheng Liu
arXiv AI
Oct 12

ProgramGym: Scaling Training Environments for Long-Horizon Program Reproduction Agents

ProgramGym introduces a scalable framework for training long-horizon program reproduction agents, comprising Program-Env and Program-Agent components. Program-Env builds verifiable training environments from repositories via a feedback loop that repairs sandbox builds and improves black-box tests, yielding 1,648 environments across C, C++, Go, and Rust. Program-Agent employs a role-isolated workflow of analysis, implementation, and review with revision management, boosting performance on ProgramBench and raising Qwen3.8-27B’s accuracy from 34.87% to 42.84% and surpassing flagship models with fine-tuning.

By Chengyi Yang, Renxu Bao, Jue Hou, Zongpei Teng, Ziheng Wang, Yujie Lin, Chengsong Huang, Junnan Zhu, Delai Qiu, Yining Wang, Shengping Liu, Fei Long, Jinsong Su
arXiv AI
2d ago

Skeleton Coding: Program Structure as a Specification for Agents

The paper introduces Skeleton Coding, a method where developers jointly specify a program’s structure—its data types, modules, and functions—alongside behavioral tests. This approach allows the agent to first commit to a structure, narrowing the search space of possible programs, and then use tests to select the correct implementation. Empirical results across multiple models and benchmarks show that skeletons can dramatically reduce the number of required tests, improve accuracy, and lower implementation costs.

By Aditya Golatkar, Alessandro Achille, Renos Zabounidis, Vlad Sobal, Yangruibo Ding, Baishakhi Ray, Jonathan Buck, Guy Van den Broeck, Maryam Fazel, Pietro Perona, Wei Xia, Stefano Soatto
arXiv AI
5d ago

Benchmarking LLM Agents for Behaviorally Adequate Test Generation from Software Requirements

The paper introduces Req2Test-Bench, a benchmark of 5,086 instances linking natural‑language Gherkin requirements to developer‑written test implementations across five languages and four BDD frameworks. It evaluates eight agent–model–reasoning setups, finding that while the best configuration (Codex with DeepSeek‑V4.1‑Flash) produces passing tests for 82.8% of cases, only 33.8% are behaviorally adequate, as measured by kill‑completeness. The study highlights diminishing returns from scaling agents, the impact of under‑specified requirements, and the potential of requirement‑grounded harnesses to improve test generation.

By Binhang Qi, Yiming Liu, Yun Lin, Yangjie Zhou, Hailong Sun, Jin Song Dong