The paper presents a newly curated, multi-center, multi-modal, and longitudinal lung cancer dataset comprising 1,365 patients with whole-slide images, CT scans, PET scans, structured clinical data, transcriptomics, and follow-up information. The dataset features substantial, non-uniform missingness across modalities, making it ideal for evaluating robust multi-modal fusion strategies. Benchmarks on 12‑month overall survival, disease‑specific survival, and longitudinal hazard prediction demonstrate that integrating complementary modalities consistently outperforms uni-modal approaches, even under severe missing data.
arXiv:2606. 17115v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Foundation models (FMs) have emerged as powerful representation extractors for medical data, yet their generalizability to datasets under distribution shift remains underexplored.
arXiv:2609.14072v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have displayed impressive capabilities in handling tasks that require few demonstration examples, making them effective fe...
arXiv:2610.07694v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The integrative analysis of histopathological Whole-Slide Images (WSIs) and transcriptomic profiles holds significant promise for cancer survival predi...
arXiv:2607. 09982v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Electronic health record (EHR) data are inherently multimodal, and leveraging multiple modalities can improve predictive performance.
arXiv:2605. 25050v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Integrating multimodal datasets in clinical oncology is frequently hindered by high dimensionality and blockwise missingness, where entire data sources are unavailable for specific patient subsets.
arXiv:2606. 15038v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Accurate time-to-event (TTE) prediction from multimodal clinical data remains challenging due to modality imbalance and distribution shift.
Accurate prognosis prediction is important for treatment planning in lung cancer, but deep learning-driven survival modelling is often limited by the scarcity of curated imaging cohorts with reliable outcome data. This study evaluates whether representations from a domain-specific foundation model can be used for multimodal survival prediction in data-constrained clinical settings.
arXiv:2510.06113v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Survival analysis plays a vital role in making clinical decisions. However, the models currently in use are often difficult to interpret, which red...
arXiv:2608. 02769v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Multimodal supervised learning seeks to leverage multiple heterogeneous data sources to improve predictive performance.
The paper introduces MedCertAIn, a framework that uses data‑driven priors to enhance uncertainty estimation in multimodal clinical models. By integrating cross‑modal similarity and modality‑specific corruptions into neural network priors, the authors improve predictive performance and selective prediction for in‑hospital mortality risk using MIMIC‑IV and MIMIC‑CXR data. The results demonstrate competitive accuracy and notable gains over deterministic and stochastic baselines, underscoring the potential of such priors for reliable, uncertainty‑aware clinical decision support.
arXiv:2608.24688v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Precision oncology necessitates a longitudinal model of patient state that captures cancer evolution and treatment over time, integrating multimodal ob...
Multimodal fusion learning (MFL) has shown great potential in the medical domain, where we are faced with disparate data modalities such as imaging, clinical records, and omics. However, existing MFL strategies face several major challenges.