Hugging Face Trending Papers

CT-CLIP Representations for Multimodal Lung Cancer Survival Prediction

Read the original on Hugging Face Trending Papers →

Accurate prognosis prediction is important for treatment planning in lung cancer, but deep learning-driven survival modelling is often limited by the scarcity of curated imaging cohorts with reliable outcome data. This study evaluates whether representations from a domain-specific foundation model can be used for multimodal survival prediction in data-constrained clinical settings.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at Hugging Face Trending Papers.

arXiv AI
Sep 21

MIST: Multimodal Survival Prediction with Genomic-Guided Histology Attention

MIST is a multimodal survival prediction framework that fuses whole-slide images and genomic profiles by representing genomic features as tokens that query histology context tokens derived from a foundation model. The architecture enriches molecular information with histology context before survival prediction, avoiding late-stage merging of separately encoded modalities. Training incorporates discrete-time survival prediction, genomic feature masking, WSI dropout, and contrastive alignment, and demonstrates improved external C-index across colon, renal, lung, and glioblastoma cohorts compared to standard fusion baselines.

By Muhammet Sami Yavuz, Sabri Mustafa Kahya, Richard R. Chen, Jana Lipkova, Benedikt Wiestler
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 7

Real-World Multi-Modal and Longitudinal Lung Cancer Dataset

The paper presents a newly curated, multi-center, multi-modal, and longitudinal lung cancer dataset comprising 1,365 patients with whole-slide images, CT scans, PET scans, structured clinical data, transcriptomics, and follow-up information. The dataset features substantial, non-uniform missingness across modalities, making it ideal for evaluating robust multi-modal fusion strategies. Benchmarks on 12‑month overall survival, disease‑specific survival, and longitudinal hazard prediction demonstrate that integrating complementary modalities consistently outperforms uni-modal approaches, even under severe missing data.

By Rita Cordeiro Mendes, Maria Rita Fonseca Verdelho, Carlos Santiago, Catarina Barata
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 2

Foundation Models vs. Radiomics for Lung Computed Tomography: A Benchmark of Feature Extractors, Classification Heads, and Segmentation Choices

arXiv:2607. 01001v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Radiomics is the established approach for CT-based lung cancer phenotyping, yet comparisons with foundation models rarely isolate contributions of feature extractor, classification head, and segmentation choice, or test cross-cohort robustness.

By Nils Neukirch, Martin Maurer, Nils Strodthoff
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 24

Multimodality Stacking with Blockwise missing values and application to the PIONeeR biomarkers study for prediction of resistance to immunotherapy

arXiv:2605. 25050v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Integrating multimodal datasets in clinical oncology is frequently hindered by high dimensionality and blockwise missingness, where entire data sources are unavailable for specific patient subsets.

By Mohamed Boussena, Florence Monville, Jacques Fieschi-Meric, Frederic Vely, Pierre Milpied, Julien Mazieres, Maurice Perol, Eric Vivier, Laurent Greillier, Fabrice Barlesi, Sebastien Benzekry