Hugging Face Trending Papers

MS-Exam-Gen: Source-Grounded Benchmark Construction for Evaluating LLMs on Textual Multiple Sclerosis MRI Knowledge

MS-Exam-Gen is a reproducible framework that builds a source‑grounded multiple‑choice question benchmark for evaluating large language models on knowledge about multiple sclerosis MRI. The pipeline uses expert‑indexed sources, topic induction, evidence‑grounded MCQ generation, automated quality audits, and consistency checks to produce a 3,058‑item benchmark covering 16 topics and 53 subtopics. Evaluation of 12 LLM endpoints on this benchmark revealed a wide accuracy range (89.7% to 46.9%) and identified items frequently missed by models, while audits showed reduced answer cues and position‑sensitivity in scoring.

arXiv AI
Jun 9

Automatic Extraction of Structured Information from Brain MRI Reports Using an Open-Weight Large Language Model

arXiv:2606. 07721v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Objectives: Automatic data extraction from free-text radiology reports enables large-scale research, but few studies assessed the performance of large language models (LLMs) on Dutch neuroradiology reports.

By Kaouther Mouheb, Amos Pomp, Antoine Manenti, Romy de Haan, Farog Faghir, Joy Martens, Harro Seelaar, Francesco Mattace-Raso, Meike W. Vernooij, Frank J. Wolters, Stefan Klein, Esther E. Bron
arXiv AI
Aug 24

An integrated diffusion-weighted imaging processing and interpretation platform for MR-guided radiotherapy

An integrated, web‑based platform has been developed to process diffusion‑weighted imaging (DWI) from MR‑guided linear accelerators and provide structured, literature‑grounded clinical interpretations. The system combines a deep‑learning pipeline for distortion correction, denoising, and IVIM/ADC fitting with a retrieval‑augmented generation (RAG) agent that references a curated knowledge base and traces each statement to its source. Independent expert ratings of nine glioblastoma cases showed high scores for clinical reasoning, citation quality, and overall utility, with a mean rating of 4.65 out of 5.

By Yunxiang Li, Yan Dai, Yen-Peng Liao, Jie Deng, Jill B De Vis, You Zhang
arXiv AI
Jun 15

Can LLMs Accurately Score Medical Diagnoses and Clinical Reasoning?

arXiv:2604. 14892v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Evaluating medical AI systems using expert clinician panels is costly and slow, motivating the use of large language models (LLMs) as alternative adjudicators.

By Amy Rouillard, Sitwala Mundia, Linda Camara, Ziyaad Dangor, Michael Cameron Gramanie, Ismail Kalla, Shabir A. Madhi, Kajal Morar, Marlvin T. Ncube, Haroon Saloojee, Bruce A. Bassett
arXiv AI
Jun 16

EHRNote-ChatQA: A Benchmark for Evidence-Grounded Multi-Turn Clinical Question Answering over Longitudinal Discharge Summaries

arXiv:2606. 15735v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Discharge summaries are crucial clinical documents containing the context of a patient's overall hospital stay, and are routinely reviewed by medical experts for patient readmission, ongoing care, and diagnostic decision-making.

By Jiyoun Kim, Muhan Yeo, Eunhye Jang, Jeewon Yang, Hangyul Yoon, Su Ji Lee, Hee Jo Han, Hee-Jae Jung, Doyun Kwon, Jun young Lee, Jaehun Lee, Jung-Oh Lee, Sunjun Kweon, Jong Hak Moon, Daseul Kim, Minjae Cho, Edward Choi
arXiv AI
5d ago

Jev in Medicine: A Benchmark Evaluation

The study evaluates Jev 1.13, a non‑generative model that selects from predefined answer options, on four medical benchmarks: MetaMedQA, PubMedQA, DiagnosisArena‑MCQ, and the NEJM Case Challenges. Jev’s top‑1 accuracy matches GPT‑6 Sol with medium reasoning on PubMedQA but falls behind on MetaMedQA, DiagnosisArena‑MCQ, and NEJM cases. While Jev shows strong calibration on MetaMedQA and is fast and inexpensive, its performance on examination and complex diagnostic tasks is substantially lower, indicating the need for task‑specific validation before clinical deployment.

By Alfredo Madrid-Garc\'ia, Beatriz Merino-Barbancho
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 23

MultiViewDx: Evidence-Linked Multi-View Clinical Diagnosis

MultiViewDx is a physician‑validated multimodal instruction dataset that links medical imaging studies with patient context and normalizes heterogeneous reports into an evidence‑linked workflow (evidence → findings → differential discussion → diagnosis). The dataset covers a wide range of imaging modalities and uses a unified image‑text retriever to ensure that instruction synthesis is grounded in source‑supported evidence. Fine‑tuned models on MultiViewDx achieve the highest average accuracy on four MedVQA benchmarks and receive the strongest overall rating on JAMA Clinical Challenge cases, with ablations confirming the importance of case‑level multi‑view organization and evidence‑linked reasoning.

By Junda Wang, Zonghai Yao, Yujan Ting, Eric Z. Chen, Hieu Tran, Hong Yu, Weijing Huang, Terrence Chen
arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 27

Retrieval-Augmented Agentic Rubric Generation for Reliable Medical Response Evaluation

The paper introduces a retrieval‑augmented multi‑agent framework that automatically generates instance‑specific evaluation rubrics for medical language models. By retrieving authoritative medical evidence, decomposing it into atomic facts, and combining these with user interaction constraints, the system produces fine‑grained criteria that outperform GPT‑4o on HealthBench and LLMEval‑Med. The generated rubrics also guide response refinement, improving medical LLM output quality by 9.2%.

By Yinzhu Chen, Abdine Maiga, Hossein A. Rahmani, Emine Yilmaz