The paper introduces BRIE, a continuously maintainable benchmark for evaluating large language models (LLMs) in electronic health record (EHR) information retrieval. It presents a scalable framework that automatically generates question–answer pairs from longitudinal EHR notes, validated by nineteen clinicians. The benchmark allows assessment of multiple inference strategies and highlights that state‑of‑the‑art LLMs often miss clinically important information, especially when synthesis across documents is required.
By Jordan L. Cahoon, Chloe O. Stanwyck, Sulaiman Somani, Philip Chung, Kevin R Keet, Kameron C. Black, Andrea T. Fisher, Sarita Khemani, Jerry Liu, Stephen Ma, Saloni K. Maharaj, Rita M. Pandya, Eduardo Perez-Guerrero, Priyanka Pillai, Lisa Shieh, David J. H. Wu, James Xie, James C. McAvoy, Teresa Nguyen, Jessica Tran, Lucy Yin, Bridget Lin, Alison Callahan, Jason A. Fries, Nigam H. Shah, Emily Alsentzer
The UIC-AIHealth4All system was presented for the ArchEHR-QA 2026 shared task on grounded question answering from electronic health records. It participated in evidence identification, answer generation, and answer‑evidence alignment, using an answer‑first pipeline that generates candidate answers with cited note sentences before classifying the full evidence set. The system ranked third in evidence identification, ninth in answer generation, and fifth in answer‑evidence alignment, and a linguistic analysis showed its outputs were harder to read than clinician‑authored references, highlighting the need for readability optimization in clinical NLP.
By Mohammad Arvan, Hossein Haeri, Natalie Parde, Rebecca T. Feinstein
The paper introduces BRIE, a scalable framework that automatically creates question–answer pairs from longitudinal electronic health record notes, validated by nineteen clinicians. It offers a continuously maintainable benchmark for evaluating large language models in clinical settings, addressing limitations of manual, costly, and quickly outdated existing benchmarks. Experiments across nine LLMs and five inference strategies reveal that even state‑of‑the‑art systems often miss clinically important information, especially for synthesis‑heavy queries.
MTDiag is a newly released multi-turn diagnostic dialogue dataset designed to evaluate large language models (LLMs) in clinically meaningful ways. It is built from DDXPlus, MIMIC-IV, and AJCR case reports, covering both common emergency department presentations and rare conditions, and normalizes cases into a canonical schema using UMLS concept identifiers and ICD-10 codes. The dataset includes a UserLM‑8B utterance‑generation pipeline and physician‑validated natural‑language utterances, and introduces clinical knowledge‑grounded metrics that go beyond simple diagnostic accuracy for multi‑turn differential diagnosis tasks.
By Pia Chouayfati, Alexander M. Fichtl, Miriam Ansch\"utz, George Doumat, Georg Groh
arXiv:2607. 06452v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Biomedical question answering requires not only accurate extraction of information from scientific literature but also reliable integration of evidence across multiple documents.
By Taeyun Roh, Eunha Lee, Wonjune Jang, Sohyun Chung, Junha Jung, Jaewoo Kang
arXiv:2609.15964v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have been widely adopted for clinical question answering (QA). Current systems can attach citations to their answers, but...
By Jiashuo Zhang, Yuling Chen, Yvonne Commodore-Mensah, Michael Oberst
arXiv:2607. 06641v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) achieve promising results on medical question answering benchmarks, yet their use in public health is constrained by hallucinations and the rapid evolution of official guidance.
By Felix Feldman, Joshua Harris, Timothy Laurence, Leo Loman, Ollie Higgins, Fan Grayson, Poonam Soma, Bethany Pace-Bonello, Michael Borowitz, Toby Nonnenmacher
arXiv:2608.28624v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Accurate interpretation of single-visit and longitudinal clinical assessments for Parkinson's disease is time-consuming and often depends on speciali...
By Sana Alamgeera, Denise Goberta, Muhammad Irshad, Anne H. H. Ngu
MMTClinic is a new benchmark that tests large language models on complex reasoning and question‑answering tasks involving clinical time‑series data. It combines text, medical images, and multivariate physiological signals to create 30,000 QA pairs—including 15,000 multiple‑choice and 15,000 open‑ended questions—in five languages (English, Hindi, Bengali, Marathi, and Tamil). The benchmark covers mortality prediction, heart‑rate forecasting, and SOFA score estimation, and evaluates 13 state‑of‑the‑art LLMs across zero‑shot, few‑shot, and chain‑of‑thought settings, revealing significant performance gaps across tasks, languages, and modalities.
By Sourav Malakar, Harshit Nigam, Akash Ghosh, Sriparna Saha, Amlan Chakrabarti, Saptarsi Goswami, Priti Singh
arXiv:2603. 23522v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Evaluating large language models (LLMs) on open-ended questions is difficult because response quality depends on the question's context.
By Shanghua Gao, Yuchang Su, Pengwei Sui, Curtis Ginder, Marinka Zitnik
arXiv:2409. 07314v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: While Large Language Models (LLMs) achieve superhuman performance on standardized medical licensing exams, these static benchmarks have become saturated and increasingly disconnected from the functional requirements of clinical workflows.
By Praveenkumar Kanithi, Cl\'ement Christophe, Marco AF Pimentel, Tathagata Raha, Prateek Munjal, Nada Saadi, Hamza A Javed, Svetlana Maslenkova, Nasir Hayat, Ronnie Rajan, Shadab Khan
arXiv:2610.01938v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Exam-style accuracy does not establish whether large language models (LLMs) reason well over clinical records. We define clinical reasoning as integr...
By Zhangshu Joshua Jiang, Zina Ibrahim, James T. Teo