arXiv Computation and Language

How Much Does Corpus Choice Change Dependency-Distance Estimates?

The study examined how the choice of corpus affects estimates of dependency distance in language. By comparing 38 pairs of treebanks from the same language, the authors found that cross-treebank agreement was only moderate, with nearly 40% of language orderings reversed when switching treebanks. Treebank selection explained about 29% of the variance, a discrepancy that far exceeds within-treebank sampling error and persists across multiple preprocessing settings, yet all treebanks still supported the principle of dependency-length minimization.

arXiv Computation and Language
Oct 12

BLiMPPI: Benchmark of Linguistic Minimal Pairs for Polarity Items

BLiMPPI is a multilingual benchmark comprising over 12,000 minimal pairs for negative polarity items (NPIs) across 33 languages. It is constructed by extracting NPIs from Universal Dependencies treebanks, labeling their licensing contexts, and generating minimal pair perturbations. The study evaluates 12 multilingual and 2 monolingual language models, revealing that multilingual models perform poorly on low‑resource languages and on pairs that cannot be solved by simple n‑gram patterns, while also exploring how NPI typology, language family, licensing variability, and NPI‑licenser distance affect performance.

By Arzu Burcu G\"uven, Anna Rogers, Leonie Weissweiler, Joakim Nivre, Rob van der Goot
arXiv AI
Jun 12

AfriSUD: A Dependency Treebank Collection for Evaluating Models on African Languages

arXiv:2606. 12708v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Despite their linguistic diversity and global significance, African languages remain underrepresented in research and resources to support NLP.

By Happy Buzaaba, Cheikh Mouhamadou Bamba Dione, David Ifeoluwa Adelani, Sylvain Kahane, Kim Gerdes, Bruno Guillaume, Kevin Guan, Aremu Anuoluwapo, Naome A. Etori, Shamsuddeen Hassan Muhammad, Utitofon Inyang, Peter Nabende, David Sabiiti Bamutura, Andiswa Bukula, Chinedu Uchechukwu, Rooweither Mabuya, Idris Akinade, Christiane Fellbaum
arXiv Computation and Language
Oct 22

A Parallel Multi-Dialect Arabic Dependency Treebank

The paper introduces MADARTB, the first large-scale parallel Arabic dependency treebank covering five city dialects—Beirut, Cairo, Doha, Rabat, and Tunis—alongside Modern Standard Arabic. It contains 5,000 sentences annotated with the CATiB dependency scheme and shows that while overall construction profiles are similar across varieties, local syntactic structures often diverge, indicating significant structural variation. A supervised parser achieves 87.5% LAS, outperforming the best LLM setup at 85.7% LAS across all six varieties, and the authors release the annotations and models publicly.

By Noor Abo Mokh, Mohamed Adel, Jamila El-Gizuli, Go Inoue, Ahmed Elshabrawy, Nizar Habash
arXiv Computation and Language
6d ago

Once a Tree, Always a Tree? Cross-lingual Transfer of Hierarchical Generalization in Language Models

The paper investigates whether language models can transfer hierarchical syntactic knowledge from a source language (L1) to a target language (L2) using a novel cross‑lingual poverty‑of‑stimulus (CPOS) experimental design. Results show that models can partially transfer L1 structural evidence to L2, producing a small but detectable hierarchical bias that varies across language pairs. The study further demonstrates that vocabulary overlap is crucial for successful transfer, indicating that cross‑lingual learning of hierarchical generalization is conditionally achievable.

By Shin Yamaguchi, Masaya Taniguchi, Tatsuki Kuribayashi, Taro Watanabe, Yoshinobu Kano
arXiv AI
Sep 10

FreqBLiMP: Frequency-Controlled Minimal Pairs Reveal Robustness and Fragility of LLMs Under Lexical Rarity

FreqBLiMP is a frequency‑controlled extension of the BLiMP minimal‑pair benchmark that regenerates all 67 paradigms under explicit Zipf‑frequency regimes while preserving grammatical contrasts. The study evaluates multiple open‑weight LLM families and finds that lower lexical frequency consistently reduces sentence likelihood, yet overall contrastive acceptability accuracy drops only modestly. However, the stability in aggregate accuracy hides significant variability across linguistic phenomena, with models remaining robust on overt morphosyntactic generalization but degrading on lemma‑specific tasks.

By Tyrone White, Yuki Arase
arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 27

Apples to Apples? Towards Comparable Crosslingual Language Model Evaluation

The paper investigates how to fairly compare language models across languages, noting that current evaluation methods vary widely and lack empirical validation. By training controlled monolingual models on parallel data and testing multilingual LLMs, the authors find that many normalized metrics suffer from biases due to tokenization, encoding, and orthographic differences. Instead, they recommend using sentence‑level negative log‑likelihood over semantically equivalent sequences for more reliable cross‑lingual comparisons.

By Xiulin Yang, Ethan Gotlieb Wilcox, Catherine Arnett