arXiv:2509.15114v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: A controversial test for Large Language Models concerns the ability to discern possible from impossible language. While some evidence attests to th...
By Evelina Leivada, Raquel Montero, Paolo Morosi, Natalia Moskvina, Tamara Serrano, Nikoleta Pantelidou, Marcel Aguilar, Fritz Guenther
The study evaluates eleven autoregressive transformer models on English agreement attraction scenarios using a surprisal-based approach. Results show that while transformers match human reading times for prepositional phrase configurations, they perform poorly on object‑extracted relative clauses, with predictions diverging across models and failing to capture human interference patterns. The authors argue that current transformers cannot adequately model human morphosyntactic processing and call for more rigorous, comprehensive testing to avoid misleading conclusions from limited syntactic setups.
By Titus von der Malsburg, Sebastian Pad\'o
arXiv:2606. 30815v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Recent work suggests that transformer language models show a bias towards human languages over unnatural ("impossible") languages argued to be unacquirable by humans.
By Ram Janarthan, Coleman Haley, Sharon Goldwater
arXiv:2606. 00230v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Grokking, the phenomenon in which neural networks generalize long after fitting their training data, has been studied in supervised settings on many epochs.
By Sherin Muckatira, Namrata Shivagunde, Vijeta Deshpande, Anna Rumshisky
arXiv:2605.27268v2 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Modern Large Language Models (LLMs) are often criticized for producing repetitive and homogeneous text, despite possessing vast latent vocabu...
By Samer Awad, Javier Conde, Carlos Arriaga, Tairan Fu, Javier Coronado-Bl\'azquez, Pedro Reviriego
BLiMPPI is a multilingual benchmark comprising over 12,000 minimal pairs for negative polarity items (NPIs) across 33 languages. It is constructed by extracting NPIs from Universal Dependencies treebanks, labeling their licensing contexts, and generating minimal pair perturbations. The study evaluates 12 multilingual and 2 monolingual language models, revealing that multilingual models perform poorly on low‑resource languages and on pairs that cannot be solved by simple n‑gram patterns, while also exploring how NPI typology, language family, licensing variability, and NPI‑licenser distance affect performance.
By Arzu Burcu G\"uven, Anna Rogers, Leonie Weissweiler, Joakim Nivre, Rob van der Goot