arXiv:2606. 00442v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Many machine learning techniques rely on approximating a loss function's curvature, but this is notoriously hard to do at the scale of modern deep networks.
By Artem Artemev, Rui Xia, Benjamin M. Boyd, Youjing Yu, Felix Dangel, Guillaume Hennequin, Alberto Bernacchia
The standard convergence analysis of mini-batch stochastic gradient descent (SGD) models gradient noise using a single variance term that treats all parameter directions equally, ignoring the fact that noise in high-curvature directions has less impact because learning rates are already constrained there. We introduce Curvature-Weighted Gradient Diversity (CWGD), a geometry-aware measure that weights per-sample gradient diversity by the inverse square root of the Hessian, providing a tighter proxy for the effective optimization noise.
arXiv:2606. 30455v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The standard convergence analysis of mini-batch stochastic gradient descent (SGD) models gradient noise using a single variance term that treats all parameter directions equally, ignoring the fact that noise in high-curvature directions has less impact because learning rates are already constrained there.
By Muhammad Hamza (Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur), Ayush Goel (Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur)
arXiv:2402.11215v4 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: The choice of batch size in minibatch stochastic gradient optimization is critical for both optimization and generalization performance in large-sc...
By Tim Tsz-Kit Lau, Han Liu, Mladen Kolar
arXiv:2606. 27171v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: This work addresses the problem of variance in stochastic gradient estimation for machine learning optimization.
By Jonne Pohjankukka, Jukka Heikkonen
The paper presents an exact, information‑theoretic analysis of stochastic gradient descent (SGD) and its variants, showing that a preconditioned SGD step corresponds to a posterior‑mean update in a Gaussian Bayes model. It decomposes one‑step regret into an intrinsic‑time cost and a change in comparator information, extending this split to an identity for the objective itself. The framework links convex convergence, saddle‑point escape, flatness‑generalization trade‑offs, learning‑rate schedules, adaptive optimizers, and various SGD variants, and it is validated on synthetic and real training runs, revealing how different optimizers achieve the same training loss through distinct step characteristics.
By Akshay Balsubramani
arXiv:2610.10428v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Gradient observations promise more accurate Gaussian process (GP) surrogates, but the cost of incorporating them has long stood in the way of realizi...
By Hyunseok Seung, Matthias Katzfuss
arXiv:2610.33516v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Modern gradient boosting algorithms are based on Newton's method, which excels empirically but lacks global convergence guarantees. While recent work o...
By Nikita Zozoulenko, Daniel Falkowski, Thomas Cass, Lukas Gonon
arXiv:2209. 03282v5 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Accelerating the convergence of second-order optimization, particularly Newton-type methods, remains a pivotal challenge in algorithmic research.
By John Chiang
arXiv:2605. 02701v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We propose a robust gradient estimator based on per-sample gradient clipping and analyze its properties both theoretically and empirically.
By Davide Nobile, Philipp Grohs
arXiv:2607. 18306v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Sharpness-Aware Minimization (SAM) improves generalization by minimizing the worst-case loss in a local parameter neighborhood.
By Zhen Huang, Jiaxin Deng, Junbiao Pang
arXiv:2602. 11557v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: A variety of widely used optimization methods like SignSGD and Muon can be interpreted as instances of steepest descent under different norm-induced geometries.
By Jichu Li, Xuan Tang, Difan Zou