arXiv:2609.36771v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Root cause analysis (RCA) is a critical problem in many real-world scenarios. RCA enables the identification of faulty or failing mechanisms in a sys...
By Md Musfiqur Rahman, Kenneth Lee, Ziwei Jiang, Padmaja Jonnalagedda, Ruocheng Guo, Murat Kocaoglu
arXiv:2606. 17516v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Causal discovery from observational data remains challenging due to the need to recover directed structure and latent confounding without interventions.
By Patrick Bl\"obaum, Krishnakumar Balasubramanian, Shiva Prasad Kasiviswanathan
arXiv:2609.06941v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Causal effect estimation asks how an outcome would change under an intervention, and medicine, economics, and public policy all treat it as a foundatio...
By Haohao Zhou
arXiv:2607. 01104v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: In Large Language Model (LLM) training, data mixing plays a pivotal role in determining model performance.
By Zinan Tang, Yukun Zhang, Shaomian Zheng, Zhuoshi Pan, Qizhi Pei, Dingnan Jin, Jun Zhou, Yujun Wang, Biqing Huang
ProximalFM is a transformer‑based model that uses prior‑data fitted networks (PFNs) to perform Bayesian proximal causal inference under hidden confounding. By training on synthetic data generated from structural causal models with oracle counterfactuals, it amortizes the Bayesian operator inversion into a single forward pass, producing posterior estimates of the conditional average treatment effect (CATE). The approach consistently outperforms prior methods across various proximal regimes, especially when latent confounding is strong and proxy variables are weakly informative, and it requires no dataset‑specific tuning.
By Christophe Muller, Ayub Kharel, Alex Luedtke, Chan Park, Eric Tchetgen Tchetgen, Juan L. Gamella, Rahul Krishnan, Ricardo Silva, Jakob Zeitler
arXiv:2602. 06337v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Causal inference is essential for decision-making but remains challenging for non-experts.
By Junqi Chen, Sirui Chen, Chaochao Lu
arXiv:2607. 11508v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Causal discovery, the process of recovering underlying causal structures from observational data, is a fundamental pursuit across scientific disciplines.
By Jie Qiao, Ruichu Cai, Zijian Li, Weilin Chen, Pengfei Hua, Boyan Xu, Zhengming Chen, Zhifeng Hao, Peng Cui
arXiv:2609. 26290v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Causal tabular foundation models amortize effect estimation across synthetic mechanisms, but latent-effect supervision rewards posterior shrinkage instead of directly encoding the repeated-sample response needed in a fixed deployment population.
By Zhiheng Zhang
arXiv:2609.37664v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Causal Normalizing Flows (CNFs) enable causal inference from observational data given the causal structure, but they assume fully observed training dat...
By Trung-Dung Hoang, Alceu Bissoto, Tim Fl\"uhmann, David Herzig, Christos Nakas, Lia Bally, Lisa M. Koch
arXiv:2609.36337v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Tabular foundation models achieve strong performance by conditioning on labelled examples in context, but softmax attention limits their use on large d...
By David Schnurr, Felix Sarnthein, Thomas Hofmann, Imanol Schlag
arXiv:2608. 09696v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Predicting the answer to interventional ``what if'' questions --- the outcome of an action never taken --- requires a \emph{mechanistic}, causal model, not a curve fit; and learning such a model requires \emph{experiments}, because passive data leaves its mechanisms unidentified.
By Kevin Murphy
The paper investigates federated learning for linear non‑Gaussian acyclic models (LiNGAM), proposing the FedRCD family of algorithms that use higher‑order cumulants to enable privacy‑preserving causal discovery across distributed clients. It addresses limitations of existing federated methods, such as FedISHC’s failure under near‑symmetric noise, and introduces variants that balance communication rounds with algebraic noise handling. Experiments reveal that cumulant‑based federated approaches rank variables by a variance ladder induced by the DAG rather than by population asymmetry, and that marginal standardisation degrades performance while scale‑invariant DirectLiNGAM remains robust.