arXiv AI

Where Search Agents Go Off the Rails: Graph-Grounded Step-Level Verification

The paper introduces GraphRail, a verification framework for search-augmented reasoning systems that checks whether evidence covers the question, reasoning addresses the question, and reasoning is grounded in the evidence. GraphRail represents these components as structured claims and compares them without relying on a generative judge or gold answer. Experiments on three multi‑hop QA benchmarks and three reasoning frameworks show that GraphRail improves error recall over generative verifiers and remains stable under stochastic extraction, while also providing diagnoses that can guide online reasoning to detect and correct intermediate errors.

arXiv AI
Oct 1

GraphCert: Bootstrap Agentic Graph Reasoning with Certified Evidence Rubrics

GraphCert introduces a method to bootstrap graph reasoning agents by generating graph‑grounded question‑answer pairs and certifying the supporting evidence. The approach uses a Bootstrapped Graph Quizzer to produce QA pairs, then executes and semantically curates the evidence into certified rubrics that guide reward‑based training of a Graph Solver. Experiments on five GRBENCH domains show GraphCert outperforms larger LLM agents and demonstrates robust policy transfer across heterogeneous graphs.

By Weiqi Jiang, Yuchen Ying, Rui Wang, Kaixuan Chen, Bingde Hu, Shunyu Liu, Yu Wang, Tongya Zheng
arXiv Computation and Language
Oct 21

Diagnostic Analysis for Large Language Model Reasoning

The paper introduces a two-stage diagnostic evaluation to assess the structural reliability of reasoning graphs used in large language models for tasks like multi-hop question answering. Stage 1 examines how graph reliability depends on topology, prompt design, and model family, while Stage 2 evaluates the impact of graph errors on uncertainty estimation. Findings show that graph-based computation is vulnerable to upstream errors, offers limited benefit as prompt context alone, but improves confidence-based answer discrimination and enables node-level diagnostics.

By Xinyu Liu, Dongqi Fu, Jun Wu
arXiv AI
Jun 6

A2RAG: Adaptive Agentic Graph Retrieval for Cost-Aware and Reliable Reasoning

arXiv:2601. 21162v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Graph Retrieval-Augmented Generation (Graph-RAG) enhances multihop question answering by organizing corpora into knowledge graphs and routing evidence through relational structure.

By Jiate Liu, Zebin Chen, Shaobo Qiao, Mingchen Ju, Danting Zhang, Bocheng Han, Shuyue Yu, Xin Shu, Jinglin Wu, Dong Wen, Xin Cao, Guanfeng Liu, Zhengyi Yang
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 11

SearchAtlas: Analyzing Agentic Search Strategies via Evidential Query Graphs

SearchAtlas is a framework that transforms raw search trajectories of large language model (LLM) agents into structured evidential query graphs, where edges capture how evidence is propagated from queries to the final answer. The automated parsing pipeline achieves a mean edge F1 of 86.0% against human-annotated graphs and remains consistent across repeated runs. Using SearchAtlas, the authors analyze five search agents on three benchmarks, uncovering systematic differences in search scale and evidence aggregation, and revealing process failures such as fragmented answer support, unmet question constraints, and unverified parametric knowledge that correlate strongly with incorrect answers.

By Jiacheng Sang, Mengyuan Li, Sanxing Chen, Yukun Huang, Yu Feng, Bhuwan Dhingra
arXiv AI
Jun 16

VeriGraph: Towards Verifiable Data-Analytic Agents

arXiv:2606. 16603v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: LLM-based agents have demonstrated strong capabilities in data-intensive analytical tasks, yet their outputs are rarely verifiable: a reliance on linear text trajectories makes their reasoning difficult to audit.

By Jiajie Jin, Zhao Yang, Wenle Liao, Yuyang Hu, Guanting Dong, Xiaoxi Li, Yutao Zhu, Zhicheng Dou