Beyond Answer Voting: Fine-Grained Correction of LLM Reasoning through Graph Alignment across Sampled Traces
Read the original on arXiv AI →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.
The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.
Beyond Answer Voting: Fine-Grained Correction of LLM Reasoning through Graph Alignment across Sampled Traces proposes DDRG, a framework that uses graph alignment to detect claim-level disagreements in reasoning traces and selectively corrects them with a verifier. DDRG builds source‑grounded claim graphs, sends localized conflicts to an answer‑blind verifier, and applies a focused repair only when the verifier supports the majority answer’s path. Experiments on five benchmarks show that zero‑shot DDRG improves macro‑average accuracy by 8.65–15.83 percentage points over direct answering and outperforms CoT, GoT, GoV, and SC on this metric.
arXiv:2604.14121v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have become increasingly used for various tasks, often coupled with Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting to boost accuracy...
arXiv:2605. 19228v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large Language Models have achieved strong performance on reasoning tasks with objective answers by generating step-by-step solutions, but diagnosing where a multi-step reasoning trace might fail remains difficult.
arXiv:2608. 10665v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multimodal large language models often generate reasoning chains containing subtle errors that lead to incorrect answers.
arXiv:2601.20055v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Despite the syntactic fluency of Large Language Models (LLMs), ensuring their logical correctness in high-stakes domains remains a fundamenta...
arXiv:2606. 05402v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large reasoning models (LRMs) produce reasoning traces with non-linear structures, such as backtracking and self-correction, that complicate the evaluation and monitoring of the reasoning process.