arXiv:2610.00767v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Pre-training interventions are critical to alignment research, since beliefs formed during pre-training shape how a model generalizes from later trai...
arXiv:2607. 25063v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Developers judge a model checkpoint by how it behaves.
The paper introduces SynPro, a synthetic data generation framework that augments limited organic text for large language model pretraining by applying rephrasing and reformatting operations. SynPro’s generators are optimized with reinforcement learning rewards for quality, faithfulness, and data influence, and are updated continuously as training plateaus. Experiments on 400M, 1.1B, and 2B models show that SynPro can unlock 3.4–5.2× the effective tokens of standard repetition, even outperforming a non‑data‑bound oracle at larger scales.
The paper demonstrates that off‑policy merging, called grafting, outperforms on‑policy self‑distillation for continual learning. Grafting learns updates on an earlier donor checkpoint, scales the update, and optionally masks sensitive directions, thereby reducing interference with existing capabilities. Across various continual learning scenarios, grafting achieves better new‑task and old‑task performance without costly on‑policy sampling.
The paper "Stress-testing Alignment Midtraining" examines the effectiveness of alignment midtraining (AMT), a technique that continues pretraining on alignment-relevant data to improve generalisation beyond post‑training methods. Experiments on models up to 110 billion parameters and 1 billion midtraining tokens reveal that AMT can steer a model’s motivation in simple scenarios, but its effects are quickly overridden by even a tiny fraction of finetuning data with a competing motivation. The study also shows that rule-following requires demonstrations in either the midtraining or post‑training datasets to be robustly learned, leading the authors to conclude that current public evidence is insufficient to confirm that AMT resolves the core alignment challenges of powerful AI systems.
arXiv:2606. 02920v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Language-model unlearning updates a trained model to behave as if it had not seen selected training examples, while preserving utility and avoiding costly retraining.
arXiv:2609.37169v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Mid-training equips pretrained large language models with specialized and reasoning capabilities, but the returns of this stage are bounded since add...
arXiv:2607. 26173v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Alignment training, model organisms, and toy models are usually treated as separate research areas.
Alignment training, model organisms, and toy models are usually treated as separate research areas. But projects in all three frequently use supervised fine-tuning (SFT) to pursue the same underlying goals.
arXiv:2506. 14126v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Modern deep learning is increasingly characterized by the use of open-weight foundation models that can be fine-tuned on specialized datasets.
The paper investigates training-time data augmentation as a regularizer for autoregressive language model pretraining in data‑constrained, compute‑abundant settings. It introduces three orthogonal augmentation categories—token‑level noise, sequence permutations, and target offset prediction—and shows through systematic ablations that each category delays overfitting and reduces validation loss, with random token replacement performing best individually. Combining augmentation categories further lowers the minimum validation loss, demonstrating that such augmentations mitigate data inefficiency in autoregressive pretraining.
arXiv:2610.02347v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Training-data attribution aims to identify which training examples shape model behavior, yet validating such claims is difficult because causal trainin...