What Types of Human-AI Teams Exist?
arXiv:2607. 02198v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Human-AI teaming has received increasing attention in the literature.
The paper demonstrates that humans and AI systems achieve better performance when collaborating rather than working alone. It investigates how two design dimensions—autonomy and initiative—shape collaboration patterns, using a paradox perspective to uncover internal tensions and map underlying paradoxes. From this analysis, the authors derive four distinct human‑AI collaboration patterns: Instruction, Delegation, Assistance, and Co‑creation.
arXiv:2607. 02198v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Human-AI teaming has received increasing attention in the literature.
arXiv:2607. 10331v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Human-centered AI (HCAI) refers to guidelines or principles that aim on ethi-cally oriented design of systems.
arXiv:2609.05552v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Industrial environments increasingly rely on collaboration between humans and AI-enabled agents. Effective teamwork requires aligning how agents perc...
arXiv:2607. 21547v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The rapid progress of AI has intensified the long-standing pursuit of automation: replacing human participation with algorithms wherever possible.
arXiv:2606. 05222v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Artificial intelligence (AI) has been applied across educational contexts to support learning.
The paper surveys how Large Foundation Models (LFMs) can be integrated into Human‑AI Collaboration (HAI) to enhance problem‑solving and decision‑making. It outlines four key areas—human‑guided model development, collaborative design principles, ethical and governance frameworks, and high‑stakes applications—while emphasizing that effective HAI systems arise from careful, human‑centered design rather than merely stronger models. The survey also identifies open challenges related to safety, fairness, and control, aiming to guide future research toward reliable, trustworthy, and beneficial LFM‑based partnerships.
The paper reports an in‑situ qualitative study of a persistent, proactive AI teammate deployed across multiple teams in a large technology company. It finds that the human‑agent workplace is in flux, with breakdowns and negotiations emerging around tacit workflow rules, the relational boundaries of the non‑human actor, and the redistribution of trust and human agency. These micro‑negotiations are used to propose a new research, design, and organizational agenda that seeks to preserve human agency when sharing workspaces with non‑human actors.
arXiv:2606. 18413v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Automated AI agents are increasingly capable, yet many scientific and professional tasks require human judgment and contextual expertise.
arXiv:2607. 19941v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: As AI agents become integral to business workflows, establishing guiding user experience (UX) principles is crucial for ensuring user trust and successful adoption.
The paper examines how a large embedded systems company is transitioning to an AI‑first organization, focusing on the role of autonomous AI agents in software engineering. Through a mixed‑method study involving 40 workshop participants—scrum masters, architects, managers, and product owners—the authors identify expected impacts on team structure, required competencies, organizational strategies, and developer roles. The study concludes with a concrete roadmap and discusses implications for federated AI team formation, human‑in‑the‑loop practices, and sustainable AI adoption in embedded software engineering.
arXiv:2606. 09848v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: As generative and agentic AI becomes embedded in everyday products, practitioners face a persistent challenge: how to design human-AI coordination -- the ongoing mutual adjustment between users and AI systems as mediate through interfaces-that supports usability, trust, and safety.
arXiv:2608. 12355v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Recent progress in AI coding agent research has led to rapid improvements in agents' ability to autonomously perform complex software engineering tasks, from editing large codebases to executing long-horizon development workflows.