arXiv AI

Self-evolving network verifiers

arXiv:2608. 11340v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Symbolic network verifiers can reason about correctness across vast spaces of routing inputs and failures, but only for the protocols and features an expert has encoded by hand.

arXiv AI
Sep 11

Can AI Agents Deliver Verifiable Network-Wide Outcomes Across Authority Boundaries?

The paper introduces EvidenceNet, a runtime assurance layer designed to verify that coordinated AI agent operations achieve an operator’s intended network-wide outcomes across multiple administrative domains. EvidenceNet collects post-change observations from the required authority scopes, checks their freshness and validity, and uses a verifier agent to assess observation content. Experiments on live routing networks demonstrate that this approach can detect successful outcomes that configuration-action logs alone miss, and it rejects completions when observations are sourced incorrectly, substituted, or stale.

By Tianzhu Zhang, Chih-Kai Huang, Meikang Qiu
arXiv AI
Jun 2

Attested Tool-Server Admission: A Security Extension to the Model Context Protocol

arXiv:2605. 24248v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The Model Context Protocol (MCP) standardizes how a large-language-model (LLM) agent and an external tool server exchange messages, but not trust: a host reads a server's self-declared tool list and dispatches calls, with no notion of which servers it may use, at what sensitivity, or which of a server's tools are in bounds.

By Alfredo Metere
arXiv AI
Jul 31

Pramana: A Composable, Domain-Specific Backend for Empirical Networking Research

arXiv:2607. 26352v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Networking research advances by turning hypotheses into empirical evidence, so accelerating it means reducing the lag between ideation (synthesizing a hypothesis) and generating the data that tests it.

By Jaber Daneshamooz, Eugene Vuong, Alagappan Ramanathan, Manni Moghimi, Haarika Manda, Satyam Kumar, Snithik Thode, Satyandra Guthula, Sylee Beltiukov, Dongsu Han, Tarun Mangla, Sangeetha Abdu Jyothi, Walter Willinger, Arpit Gupta
arXiv AI
Sep 11

Can AI Agents Detect and Repair Artifact Drift in Network Experiments?

The paper introduces NetArtifactBench, a benchmark designed to evaluate whether AI agents can detect and repair inconsistencies in network experiment records while preserving supported claims. It tests 23 agent configurations on 52 instances with injected inconsistencies, finding an average pass rate of 65.3 % but no runtime exceeding 30 % for complex repairs that require recovering implicit relations and propagating changes across artifacts. The results highlight a clear distinction between local corrections and full record-level repair, leading the authors to argue that artifact integrity should be a primary design and evaluation criterion for AI agents in network systems.

By Tianzhu Zhang, Weichen Tao, Changgang Zheng, Yusheng Zheng, Long Chen, Xiaoyi Fan, Meikang Qiu
arXiv AI
Sep 16

Large Language Models in the Loop: A Stability- and Network-Aware Survey in Networked Control, Cyber-Physical, and Multi-Agent Systems

The article surveys how large language models (LLMs) can be incorporated into networked control systems, cyber‑physical systems, and multi‑agent networks without violating stability and safety guarantees. It proposes treating the LLM as a slow supervisor that sets high‑level goals, while a fast, certified inner loop preserves physical stability. The survey maps LLM characteristics—such as inference latency, API failures, tokenization, and hallucinations—to classical control challenges and highlights the growing gap between model capability and formal safety assurances, calling for future research on stability proofs.

By Haiping Du, Linping Chan