Hugging Face Trending Papers

WADE: A Reasoning-Annotated Benchmark for Multi-Instance Floating-Waste Grounding with Compact Vision-Language Models

arXiv Computer Vision
Aug 25

WADE: A Reasoning-Annotated Benchmark for Multi-Instance Floating-Waste Grounding with Compact Vision-Language Models

arXiv:2608.22950v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Floating waste in inland waterways threatens aquatic ecosystems and requires timely monitoring under cluttered, multi-object conditions. Existing aquat...

By Md. Asaduzzaman Shuvo, Ahsan Farabi, Md. Abdul Ahad Minhaz, Mahedi Hasan, Israt Khandaker, Ibrahim Khalil Shanto, Muhammad Nomani Kabir
arXiv Computer Vision
Aug 31

SDGBiasBench: Benchmarking and Mitigating Vision--Language Models' Biases in Sustainable Development Goals

SDGBiasBench is a large-scale benchmark suite designed to evaluate and mitigate biases in vision–language models (VLMs) when reasoning about Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). It contains 500k expert‑involved multiple‑choice questions and 50k regression tasks, allowing assessment of both decision‑level and estimation‑level bias. Experiments show that current VLMs exhibit intrinsic SDG bias, often relying on priors rather than multimodal evidence, and the proposed CADE method significantly reduces this bias, improving accuracy and reducing mean absolute error.

By Zihang Lin, Huaiyuan Qin, Muli Yang, Hongyuan Zhu
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 19

Leveraging existing sparse point annotations for benthic imagery dense segmentation

The paper presents a method that leverages sparse expert point annotations from historical benthic surveys to improve dense segmentation of marine imagery. By using these points as visual prompts for the SAM2 foundation model and introducing a mechanism to filter out unreliable points, the authors generate high‑quality pseudo‑ground‑truth masks that train more accurate fine‑grained semantic segmentation models. The approach is validated on public benthic datasets and a new benchmark featuring real‑world sparse annotations, aiming to enable scalable ecological analysis.

By Cesar Borja, Breck A. McCollum, Jarret E. Byrnes, Kenneth Sebens, Ana C. Murillo
arXiv AI
Sep 16

Det-LIME: Detector-Aware, Multi-Instance Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations for Automated Marine Mammal Detection

Det‑LIME is a detector‑aware, multi‑instance adaptation of LIME designed to explain black‑box object detectors used in marine mammal research. It generates instance‑specific, box‑aligned explanations by weighting detections, applying a proximity kernel, and using IoU‑based matching to track instances across perturbations. Evaluated on aerial drone imagery of harbor seals and a seabird case study, Det‑LIME outperformed vanilla LIME, Stabilized LIME, Deterministic LIME, and gradient‑based methods in Attribution Ratio and Max Saliency Hit Rate, offering higher‑resolution, instance‑aware explanations that aid debugging, data augmentation, and modeling improvements.

By Jiayi Zhou, David W. Johnston, Brinnae Bent
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 3

WildRoadBench: A Wild Aerial Road-Damage Grounding Benchmark for Vision-Language Models and Autonomous Agents

arXiv:2605. 20306v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We introduce WildRoadBench, a wild aerial road-damage grounding benchmark that couples direct visual grounding by vision-language models with autonomous research-and-engineering by LLM-driven agents on a single professionally annotated UAV corpus.

By Bingnan Liu, Chenhang Cui, Rui Huang, Jiani Luo, Zhirong Shen, Tinghao Wang, Xiande Huang, Lingbei Meng, Fei Shen, An Zhang
arXiv Computer Vision
Aug 26

Object Counting Across Modalities: Taxonomies, Benchmarks, Applications, and Open Challenges

The paper reviews the evolution of object‑counting techniques from class‑specific density regression to open‑vocabulary, foundation‑model‑backed counters that can handle visual and textual prompts. It highlights that current evaluation relies on a few saturated benchmarks, leading to models exploiting statistical regularities rather than true generalization. The authors propose a five‑axis taxonomy and audit the literature across domains such as microscopy, remote sensing, crowd counting, and agriculture, identifying six structural contradictions and outlining a roadmap for robust, multimodal evaluation protocols.

By Joana Konadu Owusu, Shivanand Venkanna Sheshappanavar