arXiv:2606. 04280v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Contrastive learning has become a leading paradigm for self-supervised representation learning, yet the conditions under which it recovers meaningful latent geometry remain incompletely understood.
By Justinas Zaliaduonis, Patrick Putzky, Till Richter, Sergios Gatidis
arXiv:2602. 24012v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Contrastive learning has become a cornerstone of modern representation learning, allowing training with massive unlabeled data for both task-specific and general (foundation) models.
By Roy Betser, Eyal Gofer, Meir Yossef Levi, Guy Gilboa
arXiv:2609.33741v3 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Inverse Optimal Transport (OT) based methods for representation learning learn representations such that the global OT coupling between a pai...
By Ngoc-Hai Nguyen, Thuan Nguyen, Prakash Ishwar, Shuchin Aeron
The paper investigates whether supervised contrastive learning objectives produce a regular simplex geometry in representation space when trained on long‑tailed data. It shows that existing objectives fail to achieve this geometry because they depend on class sample counts. The authors propose a fully balanced contrastive objective that provably forms a regular simplex, leading to a more balanced representation space and improved performance on long‑tailed recognition and transfer learning tasks.
By Joonhyeok Jeong, Jy-yong Sohn, Kibok Lee
arXiv:2606. 26617v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Scaling laws describe how learning performance varies with model size, data size, and compute.
By Ziyan Chen, Zhongzhu Zhou, Ding-Xuan Zhou
arXiv:2607. 09405v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Similarity search is a primary application of embedding models trained by contrastive learning.
By Nick Whiteley
arXiv:2606. 25232v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Ordered bottlenecks aim to provide utility at flexible budgets by assigning coarse information to early tokens and task-relevant detail to later ones.
By Erik Ayari, Manuel Traub, Martin V. Butz
The paper introduces Inverted Contrastive Learning for Unsupervised Feature Selection (ICLFS), a method that treats each feature as a sample by inverting the data matrix and applies a contrastive learning framework to learn consistent representations across masked positive views and a shuffled negative view. Feature saliency is derived from the magnitude of projector‑space embeddings, and a Laplacian‑Gated Ranking Correction step refines the ranking by reducing local redundancy. Experiments on 12 benchmark datasets show that ICLFS achieves the best clustering accuracy on 10 datasets compared to both classical and neural baselines, demonstrating the effectiveness of feature‑wise contrastive consistency for unsupervised feature selection.
By Utsab Ghosh, Roshni Chakraborty
arXiv:2606. 30625v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Contrastive embedding models trained with scale-invariant losses are typically paired with distance metrics like cosine similarity, effectively ignoring embedding magnitudes.
By Ziwei Su, Junyu Ren, Victor Veitch
arXiv:2607. 27660v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Submodular Information Measures (SIMs) have recently emerged as a powerful framework for representation learning and multimodal learning.
By Rishabh Iyer, Truong Pham, Anay Majee
arXiv:2511. 22823v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Weakly supervised learning has emerged as a practical alternative to fully supervised learning when complete and accurate labels are costly or infeasible to acquire.
By Miao Zhang, Junpeng Li, Changchun Hua, Yana Yang
arXiv:2609.06460v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Recently, Masked Pretraining (MPT) based on reconstruction pretraining tasks has risen to a promising self-supervised learning paradigm across various...
By Qi Zhang, Runyu Zhou, Yifei Wang, Yisen Wang