arXiv AI

World Model Science: Self-Organized Criticality, Weak Chaos, and Metastable Belief Dynamics in Long-Horizon LLM Agents

arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 10

Why Do LLM Agents Fail in Exploring New Environments? A World-Modeling Perspective

arXiv:2510.15047v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) as agents often fail to improve in new environments. We identify and characterize a failure mode we call explora...

By Shiqi Chen, Tongyao Zhu, Zian Wang, Jinghan Zhang, Kangrui Wang, Ruochen Zhou, Siyang Gao, Teng Xiao, Yee Whye Teh, Junxian He, Manling Li
arXiv AI
3d ago

Beyond Prediction: Steering VLM Agents with Retrospective World Modeling

The paper introduces Retrospective World Modeling, a new paradigm for vision‑language‑model (VLM) agents that allows them to reason backward by estimating which action most likely caused a state transition. It proposes the Self‑Consistency Reward (SCR), an intrinsic signal that measures how well a policy action aligns with this retrospective explanation, providing dense transition‑level feedback. Experiments demonstrate that incorporating SCR improves policy robustness and generalization compared to purely prospective world‑modeling approaches.

By Yongjiang Liu, Jie Zhang, Haoyue Zhang, Jingcai Guo, Deze Zeng, Song Guo
arXiv AI
Aug 25

Reward-Free Continual Adaptation for Resilient Space Robots

The paper presents a reward‑free continual learning framework for space robots that uses latent‑state world models to adapt to severe hardware degradation. By pre‑training a model‑based agent in diverse simulations, the world model learns to predict reward structure in latent space. During deployment, the observation encoder and reward predictor are frozen while only the transition dynamics are updated via unsupervised rollouts, allowing the policy to adapt using imagined trajectories without new rewards.

By Andrej Orsula, Miguel Olivares-Mendez, Carol Martinez
arXiv AI
Aug 5

Quo Vadis, World Modeling?

arXiv:2608. 02713v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Continually improving agents require dynamic interaction feedback beyond static supervision, yet direct real-environment interaction is costly, slow, unsafe, and hard to parallelize.

By Yu Yang, Xuemeng Yang, Licheng Wen, Lingdong Kong, Xiaobin Hu, Dongyue Lu, Wei Chow, Xiyan Huang, Yuxiang Feng, Yue Liao, Jianbiao Mei, Daocheng Fu, Rong Wu, Pinlong Cai, Ran Yi, Ying Tai, Jiangning Zhang, Botian Shi, Yong Liu, Shuicheng Yan
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 3

Quo Vadis, World Modeling?

Continually improving agents require dynamic interaction feedback beyond static supervision, yet direct real-environment interaction is costly, slow, unsafe, and hard to parallelize. World modeling offers a natural intermediate proxy that allows agents to query lower-cost, more controllable feedback before committing to real actions.

arXiv AI
Sep 4

CoMAP: Co-Evolving World Models and Agent Policies for LLM Agents

CoMAP introduces a framework that jointly evolves textual world models and agent policies through a closed‑loop interaction. At each decision step the world model forecasts future state feedback for candidate actions, while the agent reflects on the reliability of this feedback to refine its action. The resulting on‑policy trajectories are used to self‑distill and update the world model, improving prediction accuracy and long‑horizon decision‑making across embodied planning, web navigation, and tool‑use benchmarks.

By Youwei Liu, Jian Wang, Hanlin Wang, Wenjie Li
arXiv AI
2d ago

Beyond Memory: Harnessing Long-Horizon Agents with Explicit Belief States

Beyond Memory: Harnessing Long-Horizon Agents with Explicit Belief States introduces PoS, an inference-time framework that builds and maintains explicit belief states to guide large language model agents. Each belief state combines an estimate of the current world with unresolved task requirements, making clear what the agent still needs to learn and accomplish. PoS validates consistency, monitors task progress to detect Belief Trapping, and tailors recovery to the trapping pattern and unresolved requirements, achieving top performance across four benchmarks with all three LLM backbones.

By Yu Luo, Jiamin Jiang, Yimin Zuo, Xidao Wen, Rongchen Gao, Yongqian Sun, Shenglin Zhang, Guiyang Liu, Cheng Zhang, Fang Situ, Qi Zhou, Dan Pei