Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) stalls on a model's hardest problems: when no rollout in a group succeeds, the group-relative advantages vanish and the problem contributes no gradient, wasting the frontier examples we most want to learn from. Prepending a correct prefix of a reference solution raises the success rate, making prefix length a continuous knob on difficulty.
arXiv:2607. 07674v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) stalls on a model's hardest problems: when no rollout in a group succeeds, the group-relative advantages vanish and the problem contributes no gradient, wasting the frontier examples we most want to learn from.
arXiv:2607. 00152v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Three of the most popular methods for training language models to reason look like three different tricks.
arXiv:2607. 19313v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) improves reasoning in large language models.
arXiv:2601. 03895v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) has emerged as a popular algorithm for reinforcement learning with large language models (LLMs).
arXiv:2607. 18163v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: PPO and the GRPO baseline studied here use clipped surrogate objectives whose favorable-direction saturation introduces an abrupt change in the scalar objective's derivative.
arXiv:2606. 16733v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Policy gradient algorithms for language models optimize the same objective $J(\theta) = \mathbb{E}*{\tau \sim p*\theta(\tau)}[R(\tau)]$, which has exactly two factors: the trajectory probability $p_\theta(\tau)$ and the reward $R(\tau)$.
Group Adaptive Clipping Policy Optimization (GAPO) is a plug‑in modification to GRPO methods that adapts the importance‑sampling clipping boundary based on rollout advantage. By allowing rollouts with larger learning signals to receive proportionally greater update headroom, GAPO addresses the limitation of fixed clipping that suppresses rare but informative rollouts. Experiments on Qwen and Llama models show that GAPO consistently improves Pass@1 and Pass@k on math reasoning and coding benchmarks where base model pass rates are low.
arXiv:2606. 04560v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Reinforcement learning from verifiable rewards with GRPO is a standard approach for post-training reasoning LLMs.
arXiv:2604. 01499v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Evolution Strategies (ES) have emerged as a scalable gradient-free alternative to reinforcement learning based LLM fine-tuning, but it remains unclear whether comparable task performance implies comparable solutions in parameter space.
Reinforcement learning over a frozen reasoner has become a common recipe for teaching a policy which external tools to invoke. We show that this recipe becomes structurally mismatched in specialist sc...
The study investigates whether post‑training methods—GRPO, SFT, and DPO—improve language models’ ability to follow prompt evidence that conflicts with memorized knowledge. By comparing nine training variants across different scales and families, the authors find that grounding gains are modest for GRPO, moderate for Conflict‑SFT, and near‑ceiling for DPO, but all largely rely on the same causal attention‑head set present in the starting checkpoint. Removing the starting‑model grounding direction suppresses these gains, while adding it back recovers a significant portion of DPO’s improvement, indicating that existing model machinery drives most of the observed gains.
The paper introduces F-GRPO, a method that addresses the issue of reinforcement learning policies overfitting to common trajectories while neglecting rare correct ones. By deriving the probability of prompt‑local tail‑miss events and proposing a difficulty‑aware scaling coefficient inspired by Focal loss, the authors show that down‑weighting high‑success sampled groups can improve performance. Experiments on categorical simulations, Maze, and large language models (Qwen2.5‑7B) demonstrate that F‑GRPO raises average math pass rates and out‑of‑distribution performance without increasing group size or computational cost.